近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
HMYang
註冊: 2005-07-01
上載我的肖像
|
TC-14E II, TC-17E II, TC-20E II. Which one is better? Post time: 10 月 23 日 |
|
|
Dear all brothers, I am using 70-200 mm Nikon lens. Please advise which teleconvertor is better for bird catching. I heard that TC-20E II would dramatically reduce the photo quality. Please kindly advise.
|
|
|
|
 |
老叟
註冊: 2003-04-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: TC-14E II, TC-17E II, TC-20E II. Which one is better? Post time: 10 月 23 日 |
|
|
TC-14 啦!!
|
|
|
|
 |
HMYang
註冊: 2005-07-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: TC-14E II, TC-17E II, TC-20E II. Which one is better? Post time: 10 月 23 日 |
|
|
Whats wrong with TC-20E II? The manual said it would only cost two aperture value step down. That means adjusted from 2.8 to 3.5. Right? Is there anything I am missing? Thanks all brothers advice.
|
|
|
|
 |
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: TC-14E II, TC-17E II, TC-20E II. Which one is better? Post time: 10 月 24 日 |
|
|
兩級快門係2.8變5.6,唔係3.5
|
|
|
|
 |
kenkong
註冊: 2005-05-31
上載我的肖像
|
TC-14E II, TC-17E II, TC-20E II. Which one is better? Post time: 10 月 24 日 |
|
|
HMYang兄,
1/
每一級光圈在數字上的關系是乘1.414(2的平方根): f2 - f2.8 - f4 - f5.6 - f8... 。 f3.5 與 f2.8相差只有約半級光圈。
2/
當你用了增距鏡而導致光圈細了兩級,你支鏡會很有可能因光圈太細而不能自動對焦。假如你支鏡頭原來是f2.8,光圈細了兩級是f5.6便仍可自動對焦;但如你支鏡見f4,光圈細了兩級是f8便不能自動對焦了,詳情可查看nikon鏡頭的規格表。
|
|
|
|
 |
|