[Victorlolo]

http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?lp=ru_en&trurl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.videozona.ru%2fphoto_tests%2fReviews%2fPanasonicFZ30%2fPanasonicFZ30_page00.asp

原來Fz30 and S9500 影出來的raw分別不大 !
jepg 差別大D

[digtial_sniper]

要wide angle + 高 ISO =====> S9500

要super tele-zoom + IS + 唔入塵既鏡 ======> FZ30

[ckso]

In everyday use high iso capability give you more flexibility especially when you have chance for night shot. The very low noise iso800 of Fuji can capsure ambient light and give you great night shot !
P.S. I use F 10 and the iso 800 setting is very good and useful.

[digtial_sniper]

that's why i bought F10 as well INSTEAD OF S9500..... becuz:

1. @ night, even F10's 3x zoom, still might get hand-shake thus get blury picture.... 何況 s9500 is 10x /300mm...!! 就算有ISO 3200, 10x 無tripod...一樣blury 到死.... >___<
in this case, i rather use F10's ISO 1600 as night camera and FZ30 for day time camera (hehehe...so far i don't shoot 10x or longer range @ night without using tripod)

2. rumor said F10's ISO 1600 is more "cleanner" than S9500's ... ; o

3. S9500's burst mode is very sucks.... only 1.5fps ; (
(FZ30 has 2.5fps!!!)

i do assume S9500's zooming lens barrels is smaller than FZ30's, thus more comfortable (since i dont' have big hands), so for small-hand potenial buyer, S9500 is a good choice indeed

[Victorlolo]

我就覺得fz30都是太細部,個柄唔夠我隻手揸