[johnmok2000]

雜誌說,細機仔的NOISE雖然多,但如果像素夠高的話,那麼輸出的相片面積不變,那肉眼看上去其實不會有太大分別,就是說什麼細機仔有高像素變得很重要,不知道此說法可否成立?

[kingkonghk]

象素高左即係pixel細粒左, 即係等於noise多左又細粒左(比例上), 實際上曬相出唔出到noise就唔知, 因為一般500萬dc曬4r, 要曬出可見nois都唔係咁易

[hkzooo]

好簡單一個道理, 當一相800萬像既相, 縮到變200萬像時, 仲會唔會見到noise 丫? 有機會大家試試 :p

[johnmok2000]

即係個理論都無錯啦,咁機仔除左white balance之外,像素多一點就真的有優勢了

唉.....有個叫suzabi2005的粉腸係到炸板...搞到我真係無晒心情......

有無板主可以刪除晒佢Dpost呀?

[beancurdbean]

You theory is completely opposite in result:

Most DC use small size CCD (except R1)
1) If the number of pixels is large (e.g. 10MP in 1/1.7"), the pixel size is smaller and the noise should be obvious