近日收到不少網友意見，指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站，此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論，並正密切留意事態的發展。
| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
神金丸
註冊: 2006-03-29
上載我的肖像
|
 你地覺得係去旅行用, 17-35 f2.8 夠唔夠用?????????? Post time: 4 月 3 日 |
|
|
你地覺得係去旅行用, 17-35 f2.8 夠唔夠用??????????
定係用 17-55 2.8??????
我想出手,唔知買邊支好?
我係 dslr 0既用家!!!!
但係聴人講, 17-55 唔夠 17-35 靚!!!
所以到宜家重苦腦緊!
請各位比下你地寶貴0既意見!
謝!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (^_^)
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugen
註冊: 2002-06-04
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 你地覺得係去旅行用, 17-35 f2.8 夠唔夠用?????????? Post time: 4 月 3 日 |
|
|
|
sure AFS17-35 2.8 la
|
|
|
|
|
joecsk
註冊: 2003-05-05
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 你地覺得係去旅行用, 17-35 f2.8 夠唔夠用?????????? Post time: 4 月 3 日 |
|
|
Both are bad - too heavy and expensive for travel.
I usually take
12-24 + 24-120. Cheaper and lighter!!
Not Pro? Come on, pro or not pro depends on your photo quality. Not equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
joecsk
註冊: 2003-05-05
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 你地覺得係去旅行用, 17-35 f2.8 夠唔夠用?????????? Post time: 4 月 3 日 |
|
|
However, if you want to buy a top class lens, of course 17-55 la.
1) Hot lens in DSLR, better 2nd hand price.
2) 17-35 in DSLR, the range is not that ideal.
3) Photo quality... both are Nikon top lens. Who will actually care.
|
|
|
|
|
yslouise
註冊: 2002-12-27
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 你地覺得係去旅行用, 17-35 f2.8 夠唔夠用?????????? Post time: 4 月 3 日 |
|
|
"I usually take
12-24 + 24-120. Cheaper and lighter!!"
請問12-24 + 24-120?指什?牌子??頭？
|
|
|
|
|
Esthete423
註冊: 2002-10-04
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 你地覺得係去旅行用, 17-35 f2.8 夠唔夠用?????????? Post time: 4 月 3 日 |
|
|
yslouise :
我估計應是 Nikon
12-24 F4
12-120 VR
|
|
|
|
|
| |
