8 月 25 日 (星期一) | 會員登記|會員中心
吹水閒聊
近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1 2 3共 36 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

digtial_sniper




註冊: 2004-11-30

上載我的肖像
題目*** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake? ****     Post time: 4 月 11 日

see their SuperCCD.....pretty much blows away other competitives... if they apply a true optical anti-shake.... will be.....should we say .... PERFECT .....?

like i always dream..... FZ30's lens and burst mode + F30's CCD + S9500's dual memory slots and FZ7's burst mode....
Back to top

faststar




註冊: 2005-03-13

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

我都想,nikon 不肯,保護nikon
vr lens
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

digtial_sniper




註冊: 2004-11-30

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

o甘叫Fuji 過檔去Panasonic.....都得掛!?

or Fuji BUY Minolta / Ricoh's CCD-based AS anti-shake lor.....

many cameras using Panasonic ccd has serious noise problem.... : (
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

digtial_sniper




註冊: 2004-11-30

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

maybe after F30.....than F40 or F50 may have AS or OIS.....come on fuji~!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

~X~




註冊: 2002-11-20

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

=-=" ....
連 28mm 都唔肯整, 都唔知幾時先有防手震
特別係身痕拍少少 video 個陣, P記個類 高質素既 光學防手震真係好唔同

仲有鏡頭方面有待改善, fujinon 都叫有d名氣, 應該攪攪佢啦\n寄望佢不繼改良各方面先令人等得有價值
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

怪俠




註冊: 2004-12-16

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

嘩!咁不如好似砌電腦咁,任得你玩喇。
其實高iso點解仲要防震??
我記得FUJI以前自已都有鏡頭?,
名氣與質素絕不下於人?!
如果如你所願,集各家精華於一身,
到時衹出一個牌子就得啦,咁有乜好玩??
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

kingkonghk




註冊: 2003-01-27

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

樓上講到好似螺你命3000, 集合各種殺人武器於一身

仲有low-ISO, Long Exposure 就唔會用 vibration reduction, 一定要熄左vr/is, 唔係會冇咁正
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

digtial_sniper




註冊: 2004-11-30

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

think abou this:

even panasonic has OIS on ALL of their cameras.....they still work on high-ISO options.....even tho ISO800 and ISO1600's current quaility are really 得淡笑....but it stated out that they're not limited onto their OIS only..... and also Sony T30..... Super Steady Shot + ISO 1000..... 遲D T40 or T50 has Super Steady Shot + ISO 1600 even 2000...!!?!?! Fuji 依家仲唔肯develop their 光學防震 techni...... in near future....or by the next PM 2007 camera show, they'll 後悔....
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

cyngkevin




註冊: 2004-09-25

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

Fuji SuperCCD + OM SSWF + KM AS + Carl Zeiss lens
好唔好?
my dream cam
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

digtial_sniper




註冊: 2004-11-30

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

總之 Fuji 至少要考慮將OIS / AS 加o係D 6x or longer zoom DC ....

i assume S9500-IS will be very good selling against any other brand around ; P
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

leungbenny2000




註冊: 2006-01-04

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

S9500 doesn't have any IS. The so called IS is only increase the ISO. IS/VR/AS is a trend for the DC. Of course, the best solution is KM - AS that no need to buy and IS/VR lens. But i think IS/VR is the at least solution, only increase ISO is not workable even you can well control the noise. Fuji doesn't combine the concept of control noise (i.e. ISO) and IS together. It's two separate issues.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

digtial_sniper




註冊: 2004-11-30

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

they CAN be together......like Panasonic FZ7 (tho its iso 400 and above quaility really questionable.....)

i mean: panasonic trying to put 2 things toogher....why not Fuji?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

leungbenny2000




註冊: 2006-01-04

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

I think my definition of two separate issues is dont wanna to mix ISO and VR together that control noise in high ISO and no need to do any VR. Of course, good control of noise is necessary, but if need the user to use high ISO to take photo instead of using VR. It's another issue. I dont think high ISO can totally replace the VR.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

kingkonghk




註冊: 2003-01-27

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

如果想影d動感野, 例如殘影, 要用1/20快門, 高iso就冇幫助, 要光學防震先得
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Philippe




註冊: 2003-06-01

上載我的肖像
題目Re: *** Why Fuji doesn't invest $$$ on optical anti-shake?     Post time: 4 月 11 日

DSLR高iso雜訊控制夠好啦,點解仲有咁多防手震鏡頭出現?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1 2 3共 36 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: