[sword]

請問 適馬 和 騰龍 0既 18-200 ，邊一支會好0的？
同埋適馬支18-125 ，影像出0黎係唔係比以上兩支都好？
唔該各位^_^

[dickyyim]

sigma有小小偏黃,但外型比較好睇,輕身,手感也比騰龍好一點.
但我個人認為騰龍始於比sigma好一點.
我也買了一支騰龍的18-200.

[sword]

但適馬係唔係sharp0的架？

[jack_kowloon]

I also want to buy one of the 18-200 either from Nikon, Tamron, or Sigma, but the Nikon's price is too high. Is it worthy? I also want to know the comments from the users of those lens.

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[明哥]

Sigma 幾 sharp，Tamron soft d，但有時好似有d 霧咁，兩部各有優點。

[singpurwing]

Fof 18~200mm, of course Sigma is a bit better..
And a bit cheaper price.. which is worthy to have one. only costs $2780.

[sword]

今日買0左sigma 18-200， $2580
有無買貴0左？水貨幾錢左右？

[kmlau123]

hi sword, hong goods $2680 at broadway.

[obiwan0308]

all are crap
don't believe? get a second hand and try it YOURSELF!
If u hv money, buy Nikon 18-200 VR, it worth. it is much much better.
Or u can try Nikon 28-200 if u can miss a little wide angle, it is a good len but it is hard to find.

[obiwan0308]

Sigma and Tamron simply don't hv the technique to make a good ultra-zoom len.

[野貓]

應該差唔多,邊支平D買邊支啦.

[kcfong]

唔係技術
主要係成本問題多

如果Sigma 有支18-200
有HSM 同OS F3.5-5.6
好sharp 下
但要賣成5千
你會唔會買?

[sword]

哩兩支鏡真係好差0架？？

[老叟]

差唔差主要睇你個人眼光,其實個價巳經話你知邊支好啦!!!