[rickymak1406]

不明白, 為什麼很多 post 中都提到相機要防手震
防手震真的是一個必需功能嗎?
本人自問拍照不屬拍得好的的群
但打從幾年前 S45 時開始玩影相
都不覺有 "防手震" 的需要啊
會不會只是他們不 set ISO 呢?

[西枝]

因為相機仔 (DC仔), 除了部份 fujifilm 外, ISO400 以上大多都很"不堪"
夜晚唔用防震, ISO400 很難在戶外影到靚相..

[pingu_hk]

because many people don't know their photos have handshake problem as they only want small size photo without enlargement. If u enlarge the photo, u will know even a photo taken with a 200mm lens show handshake problem even at 1/500 when shooting without a rigid tripod

[tam_dominic]

Most people want to be able to take sharp photo at lower shutter speed such as 1/8 second.

For example at ISO 800, if you can take sharp photo at 1/8 second then with 防手震 you can take sharp photo at 1/2 second.

It is a good feature in lower light photography thus it is worth to recommend.

Happy shooting !

[怪俠]

現在DC仔實在太嬌小，實在令人把持不定，
以前雖然都有手震問題，但沖印3R唔多覺，
但現在D人要放相入電腦然後有咁大推咁大?睇，
稍有手郁就乜都現晒形，所以都係有防手震好D，
所謂相機有防手震，唔使比條女鬧到無晒癮！

[kingkonghk]

唔1:1睇冇事o既, 舊屎d傻瓜film機冇防手震, 一樣影到靚相.

[小班長ErikoB]

潮流.....

[Jacky1116]

因為以前沒有防手振，現在防手振功能，所以大家都追防手振功能！

[hkzooo]

yeah~~ 呢d野, 有好過無~~

[kingkonghk]

o岩, 有d人係咁插dslr有lcd vf, 又話廢, 都係呢句, 有好過冇

[Philippe]

舊屎d傻瓜film機冇防手震, 一樣影到靚相
因為以前大家用auto mode,係唔係都用閃燈
而家就係唔係都唔用閃燈.
唔夠光又唔用閃燈莫講話3R,就算係相機個mon都睇到手震.

[schindlerdennis]

防手震同高 ISO 係兩樣野!

防手震係不能取代高 ISO ,而高 ISO 亦不能取代防手震

[Real Nobody]

防手震係影相o既Insurance，但係佢insure o既範圍有限，淨係保到你影相冇咁易因手震而致照片模糊，而且亦唔係百分百保証得到，相影得好唔好都係睇番攝影師自己影得好唔好，之不過你俾咁多錢買部相機，在於消費者立場嚟講，用唔用一件事，有梗係好過冇啦！

[ryau]

我有 D70 同 ixus 750. 依然想買部防手振既 DC 仔. 不過最希望係 fuji 機有. 可惜...

[mk07]

可能防手震,影出來仲差d tim!
潮流ja!