[Banon]

問邊部好D之前, 請去dpreview睇o下先. :)

IXUS 800 IS review

＞不過, Lecia lens + Panasonic CCD都唔夠 IXUS800 sharp.

"I must admit to being surprised when I first looked at this comparison as I'd presumed the Leica optics on the Panasonic would give it a clear advantage at lower ISO settings. Even taking into account the stronger sharpening used by Canon there is no doubt that the SD 700 IS is producing a better result, with better edge-to-edge detail. If you sharpen the FX01 result in post processing you can reduce the difference between the two pictures, but you can't put detail back in that wasn't there in the first place. The color is typical for a Canon compact (maybe a little too 'punchy' for some tastes, but perfect for the target user). Reds are a little hot, but the comprehensive in-camera controls mean you can tone things down a little if you prefer. Overall it is hard to find anything to complain about here, and I was very pleased to see that the strong corner softness seen on previous SD models has been all but eliminated with this new optic. "

＞Noise 方面,　FX01 最多noise, F10最少

"At ISO 400 the advantages of the Super CCD sensor used in the FinePix F10 are obvious, but what's interesting is that the gulf between the two results is nowhere near as wide as it has been with most other cameras we've tested against the F10. So, whilst conventional CCD technology may not have caught up with Fuji's Super CCD, it is certainly getting closer (of course the F10 has now been replaced by the F30, we'll be looking at that camera soon). If you look closely you can see that not only is the SD 700 IS result noisier, it has lost more fine detail to noise reduction. It's worth noting that the F10's ISO 400 output really comes into its own at much lower light levels, where the SD 700 IS will produce results that look a bit noisier than this (the studio is fairly bright). On the other hand it's also worth noting that the SD 700's sensor not only gets closer to the F10 than any other similar camera we've tried, but the camera also has an image stabilization system, which to some extent avoids the need for higher ISO settings in the first place. "

800 IS
F10

[Banon]

800 IS review by dpreview.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canonsd700is/page5.asp

[怪俠]

你可以問邊部相機sharp？邊部有高ISO低noise？邊部對比度高D？邊部顏色鮮豔D？
但最好唔好咁樣比較邊部相機好D，其實一部相機?好壞需要跟據好多方面，譬如相機的用料、價錢、設計、耐用程度、功能、速度、方便使用、外形、配件、省電、軟件、售後服務、保養期、Coating................等等。

如果你每次評論相機時都衹是憑著這個網頁的測試，實在太難令人信服了，而且這幾張圖片已經看得很煩厭，就如這部FX01，你已經不衹一次的用這網頁的比試來貶低它，但我所知它推出至今一直的銷售情況也不錯呢，除了市場的推廣外，你可知道原因嗎？

Banon 兄，客觀一點吧！最適合自已的相機未必一定是在這網頁裡測試得最好的相機呢！

[Banon]

怪俠兄，多謝你的意見．

十分同意＂其實一部相機?好壞需要跟據好多方面，譬如相機的用料、價錢、設計、耐用程度、功能、速度、方便使用、外形、配件、省電、軟件、售後服務、保養期、Coating................等等＂

網上資訊係一個參考，資料的準確性及客觀性就由讀者去判斷啦．:D


"這幾張圖片已經看得很煩厭"
點解dpreview作者每次試機都用＂這幾張圖片＂呢？

＂你已經不衹一次的用這網頁的比試來貶低它"
我從冇寫FX01不好，何來貶低它呢？

＂但我所知它推出至今一直的銷售情況也不錯呢，除了市場的推廣外，你可知道原因嗎？＂
不知道，請教請教．

＂Banon 兄，客觀一點吧！最適合自已的相機未必一定是在這網頁裡測試得最好的相機呢！＂
我都冇寫邊部好Ｄ，何來不客觀呢？:)

[靚蝦王]

咁係因為阿生你次次都post呢版野出黎, 呢版係講iso, 而panasonic機係 nr做得唔好, 好明顯你就係post panasonic機既最弱點出黎 , 又唔見你會 crop下其他方面既野
上左幾個forum幾年, 最煩0個個都算係你喇
不過, 如果我要貶低一部機, 我都學識左點做喇~

[Banon]

靚蝦王兄你好,好耐冇見! :)

"咁係因為阿生你次次都post呢版野出黎"
呢版野係IXUS 800 IS, 16/7發表的,好新!好新!

"而panasonic機係 nr做得<唔好>, 好明顯你就係post panasonic機既最<弱點>出黎 , 又唔見你會 crop下其他方面既野"
原來係你貶低它! :P
我就覺得28mm好好用喇! :)

另外, 除noise之外, FX01比IXUS800 IS
Contrast低D,
Sharpness低D,
Colour saturation都低D.

再睇睇<o個幾張已經看得很煩厭圖片啦>! :)
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Canonsd700is/page5.asp

[怪俠]

Banon 兄，我們不必要與你作口舌之爭，
但閣下所作的言論在這裡已經日月可鑑，
何必每個字咁分析你的立場和目的呢？
衹不過見你對DC既有熱誠又有執著，
希望你不要過於偏頗?！