近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
JOBY
註冊: 2003-10-22
上載我的肖像
|
如果我係用dslr...想影28mm至300mm既野 Post time: 8 月 23 日 |
|
|
用一枝既18-200既好..定係 用兩枝分別係18-55和50-200既好?
邊一種出黎既相會比較好d?
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 如果我係用dslr...想影28mm至300mm既野 Post time: 8 月 23 日 |
|
|
In terms of lens design, a zoom with a larger zoom ratio requires more lens elements which results in more optical defects such as flare, CA etc.
So in terms of photo quality 18-55 + 50-200 are definitely better than 18-200 from the same brand.
Of course Nikon 18-200VR is much better than SXXXX $1500 twins lens 18-50+50-200 lah.
|
|
|
|
 |
JOBY
註冊: 2003-10-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 如果我係用dslr...想影28mm至300mm既野 Post time: 8 月 23 日 |
|
|
it means that s SXXXX twins lens 18-50+50-200 must better than SXXXX 18-200 single lens?
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 如果我係用dslr...想影28mm至300mm既野 Post time: 8 月 23 日 |
|
|
JOBY, you wrote:
"it means that s SXXXX twins lens 18-50+50-200 must better than SXXXX 18-200 single lens? "
I don't have the twin lens, but I have the 18-300 SIGMA, the photo quality is so-so, but a good travel lens. I use it mainly for travel because it is very light.
Some of my friends have 18-50, they said the quality is also so-so
My conclusion: If u have $ buy 18-200, which can be easily resell;
if u don't have $, just keep your kit lens 18-50, 18-55 or 18-70 depends on you DSLR brand.
If u want a cheap cheap telephoto, the Sigma 70-300 APO or non-APO is a good choice, 2nd hand from $700 to $1000
|
|
|
|
 |
|