[polkpolk]

C Hing:

This two len which quality are better.

Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM (Price about $2550)

But

Nikon AF 50mm f/1.4D (Price about $1850)

The different are $700. Is it mean the canon len are better qulaity?

If not , it mean canon len are expensive than nikon.

I hope some people can provide photo for your evidence.

[kingkonghk]

can0n多左usm掛, 不過50有冇usm都冇所謂啦

[bb1032003]

I brought the Canon 50mm f1.8, the performance is even better than 1.4 acording to some testing sites and the graphs provided by Canon itself only $650, extremely value for money.

Photo is good when f2.8 and up. Full apeture 1.8 will be a bit lose of contrast but it still very sharp.

[polkpolk]

Any C Hing can give me some comment for Nikon AF 50mm f/1.4D.

[Ah Chai]

I like AF 50mm F1.4 very much. it provide high quality of sharpness

by nikon AF 50mm f1.4 (Without D)

http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/viewphoto.php?photoID=385556

[beancurdbean]

50/f1.4, nikon比canon好少少, canon貴係因為多o左USM

[kingkonghk]

NIKON o個支1.4抵用, 所有牌子都好, 預算充足就買50/1.4, 唔會後悔

[lambertnh]

順道一提，光圈收到 F/9 時：

Nikon 支 50mm F/1.8 會 Sharp 過 50mm F/1.4


神奇~

[twbchang]

小弟用 Nikon 50mm/F1.4 + Kenko 1.4X 拍了兩張相片, 和大家分享。
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/enlargephoto.php?photoID=400928
http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/enlargephoto.php?photoID=400934