近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
cmmom
註冊: 2007-01-22
上載我的肖像
|
canon鏡頭一問.... Post time: 2 月 26 日 |
|
|
各位好....小弟初o黎報到.
想請教一下, canon 24-70 f2.8 同 24-105 f4 點樣選擇. 皆因現價已回落到可以負擔水平, 但各有所長, 很難決擇....想借大家嘅專業意見!!!
小弟現有,
30d
50 f1.4 人像, snap 多
100 f2.8 人像, marco 多
17-40 f4L multi purpose
70-200 f4L IS 映狗多....
覺得17-40唔係好夠長...想加多支24-70 OR 24-105, 係希望COVER尚未COVER到嘅RANGE, 打算去旅行用, 又唔駛帶支小小白IS....固然想要支大光圈, 不過有IS又好似吸引D...24-70又驚佢唔係好夠長...仲重D添....但QUALITY又好似好D喎. 設計上, 24-70 又穩陣D...
嘩!!! 好難諗呀.....拜託.
THANKS ALOT.
|
|
|
|
 |
ognirringo
註冊: 2006-11-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: canon鏡頭一問.... Post time: 2 月 26 日 |
|
|
好似24 -105 好d 喎
如果你唔帶小小白去旅行又要range 大
f/4 + is 低光都夠
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: canon鏡頭一問.... Post time: 2 月 27 日 |
|
|
Of course go for 24-105 4.0 IS, you already have 50 1.8 and 100 2.8 the 24-70 2.8 only meaningful at 50 to 70 as compare with 24-105 because the 2.8 at 24-50 is not so important for blur effect due to the focal length.
After 50 you already have 50 1.8 and 100 2.8 which can give you large apeture but for 24-105 IS is more useful as you can use 3-stop slower than normal that mean 2-stop slower than 24-70 2.8 (compare 2.8 to 4 is one stop)
In terms of image quality, the different is not that big. You can compare both at the following site.
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/index.html
|
|
|
|
 |
cmmom
註冊: 2007-01-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: canon鏡頭一問.... Post time: 2 月 27 日 |
|
|
Thanks alot.
小弟原意係帶,
50-1.4
17-40
同一支24-70 or 24-105
去旅行的.
明知24-70又重又大, 但光圈大d, 又靚d; 相反24-105就長d, 有is,但設計爭d (遮光罩跟住郁), 光圈細d...
暫時考慮中, 睇定d 3月尾cannon有冇新o野先....
thanks anyway.
|
|
|
|
 |
man1492
註冊: 2005-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: canon鏡頭一問.... Post time: 2 月 27 日 |
|
|
比我都係帶支24-105 算,去旅行 =/= 走難
|
|
|
|
 |
老叟
註冊: 2003-04-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: canon鏡頭一問.... Post time: 2 月 28 日 |
|
|
無錯啦,呢支係小三元之寶,呢排又減價,千祈咪走雞丫!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
|