[Rol]

d lighting is not reliable when use with high contrast photo like : shooting a black bird in bright sky..

In such extreme case, auto level is better than d lighting.

[Rol]

auto level is not same effect as D lighting, D light is more aggressive to correct the under expo area in photo.

[dcnut]

D-lighting is very similar to 'Shadow' adjustment. It is available in more advanced photo editing software like Photoshop.

The below picture was edited by Photoshop 'Shadow' adjustment. It is VERY useful to improve the details in shadow (dark) area and particularly good for indoor shooting where the flash is not strong enough to brighten the whole image area. Be noted that only the dark area was affected, not the highlight (bright) area.

[balance01]

同 Kodak PerfectTouch 一樣野

[老叟]

CS2 比較好D

[入門漢]

支持老叟的觀點。如果會用腦的幾時都係用腦執好得多，彈性又大，亦不阻礙相機儲相或連拍。

Panasonic的機仔本來唔錯，用Leica鏡頭，但係就衰在懶叻，強迫你用佢機仔作影像處理，用戶冇得選擇。結果在特定環境下質素奇差，最主要是低光下雜訊甚多。

[balance01]

"即 間 間 廠 都 有 自 己 1 套 對 付 暗 位 . "


Not really, I couldn't find it in the Panasonic models, least of all.

[入門漢]

你係唔會found的，因為佢係自把自為處理o左，你係冇得find，冇權話事。

你試下在稍暗環境影下相，佢會自動推到好夠光，但過猶不及。

[balance01]

而家講緊 N 記 D-lighting 同埋 K 記 PerfectTouch,

佢地係 DC 裡面一個功能,

可用可不用,

但係 P 記係冇呢個功能,

可能佢係唔係都同你整光o的暗位,

但我唔肯定係唔係咁.

[入門漢]

有選擇權的話，我如老叟兄般，支持用腦執了！

[balance01]

DC 內置方便好多嘛

[Rol]

有選擇權的話，我如老叟兄般，支持用腦執了！

----------------------

Depend on what photo, if photo with very high contrast (eg : black bird in bright sky).. Auto level / D lighting just make the photo more worse..

[Rol]

Anyway Auto level / d lighting is just for convenience. The program has no way to know your subject is bright sky, or the black bird.

If photo is not with very high contrast, D lighting is very convenient at batch correction for a lot of photo.