近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
ccrsc
註冊: 2006-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 7 月 31 日 |
|
|
各Canon 友可以發表下擁有既lens 心得,不論平貴,可以比想買鏡既影友參考下嘛。另又可以知道邊支鏡比較熱門,減低買錯鏡既機會。
大家請如實post現有既鏡,多多益善!!!
Now me have: 50mm f/1.8
100mm f/2.8 macro
35-135 f4-5.6 (舊菲林鏡)
27-70 f/2.8L
|
|
|
|
 |
ccrsc
註冊: 2006-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 7 月 31 日 |
|
|
打錯字,應該係: 24-70 f/2.8L
|
|
|
|
 |
ysmforum
註冊: 2007-07-07
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 7 月 31 日 |
|
|
你部咩機... 我諗住入既鏡好似你咁.. 同埋我都有支 28-135 舊鏡!! ^O^..
|
|
|
|
 |
ccrsc
註冊: 2006-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 7 月 31 日 |
|
|
10D
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 7 月 31 日 |
|
|
I have the followings,
Canon
50 f1.8 mark II excellent value for money.
50 f2.5 macro
1:1 live size converter (although Canon said it can only be used on 50 f2.5 but actually it can be used on almost all lens and turn it to macro len but you will lost the focus in infinity, I tried it on 70-200 f4.0 and it works)
85 f1.8 excellent portrait len
100 f2.8 macro - sharp and focus fast
17-40 f4.0L good for both FF or APS-C
24-105 f4.0L - I like the range and the IS is very useful
70-200 f4.0L IS - excellent image quality and the 4-stop IS is unbeatable
EF-S
17-55 f2.8 IS - good just like L lens for EF-S
Some other non-Canon lens
Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 good but distortion is huge
Sigma 70-300 f4-5.6 cheapest telezoom image quality ok
Tamron 28-75 f2.8 - this one quality close to Canon 24-70 f2.8L but weight only 510g and cost only $ 2850 very good len)
Body
300D, 400D and 5D
|
|
|
|
 |
andrewlaw007
註冊: 2007-03-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 7 月 31 日 |
|
|
Canon Lens
17-40 f4 - Good range and quality for 400D, but f4 only
50 f1.4 - V. good for portrait and photo for Baby without using flash
(WTB) 70-200 f2.8 - Tried and excellent image for portrait with blur background
|
|
|
|
 |
ccrsc
註冊: 2006-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 7 月 31 日 |
|
|
我未有tele,都想知多d 70-200 f/2.8呢支鏡既特性(重量已經知得好清楚)。
同埋有 is 成像會唔會真係差d呢﹖
|
|
|
|
 |
ognirringo
註冊: 2006-11-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 7 月 31 日 |
|
|
我都想知呀
冇is 會唔會好唔方便呢
我買小白都係影下特寫 可以ge話打下市雀
同埋多數都日光日白去影相
買is 係咪會買多個香爐呢
另小弟有17-55 f2.8 is
都好滿意
唯獨個zoom ring 玩多幾下就好鬆
同埋間中對唔到or 對錯焦
仲有50 f1.8
超抵玩
不過小弟極少影人 好少用呢支
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 8 月 1 日 |
|
|
我都想係Canon 70-200mm F2.8 USM L ( 冇IS), 同70-200mm F4 USM L IS之間選擇一枝, 請問邊枝好? 2.8 USM L有冇最新防塵防水設計, F4 USM L IS我就知有, 同埋請問知唔知F2.8 USM L既價錢?
|
|
|
|
 |
ccrsc
註冊: 2006-10-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 8 月 1 日 |
|
|
價錢可參考http://www.ygdragon.net/
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 8 月 1 日 |
|
|
MISBWORKSHOP,
Don't be puzzle by the dust and moisture seal, it need to be work with 1D series body to provide dust and moisture seal.
You have to choice between the two for the apeture 2.8 vs 4.0 and weight 1350g vs 760 g and no IS vs IS.
Image quality will be very similar both are very good indeed.
I select 4.0 IS because of the weight and IS; the 2.8 IS is very attractive however it is too heavy to me.
|
|
|
|
 |
MISBWORKSHOP
註冊: 2003-08-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
最後係昨日買左小小白is, 我都係貪佢輕D, 最多第時再加支300 IS F4 L! 之前以前個防震冇乜實際用途, 因我之前用Nikon AF-S 24-120mm VR就真係睇唔到太大效果, 但原來小小白果is勁好多, 有D我以為手震既相都影到! 同埋F4個景深效果都幾好....
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: ====Canon 鏡頭交流區==== Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
MISBWORKSHOP,
Congratulations on your new toy 4.0 IS , it is very good len.
ccrsc,
It seems that the lens group for image stabliser will NOT affect the image quality.
|
|
|
|
 |
|