[hungjacky]

唸住轉40D, 用佢支kit鏡定買支17-40L鏡...?
比d意見...thx...

[bean290]

how about 18-55 F2.8 IS?

[小班長ErikoB]

唔好要17-85...cos 18-55 又會出is版..一張一短來得比用17-85實際

[zerochun]

有錢緊係L啦~第時玩FF都仲用得

[andrewlaw007]

Depends on your budget, $3,000 to buy 17-85 IS is ok and give u reasonable image quality, but cannot compare with 17-40.

But if u buy 17-40, you may need to buy one more lens to cover longer zoom range.

[JSmith]

17-40 + 24-70，40D用得時，FF又用得

[hungjacky]

Um...budget大概可以去到5千左右, 其實兩支鏡係相度可看到咩分別? thx all...

[hungjacky]

上面師兄話18-55 F2.8 IS o唔ok架? 大概機$? thx...

[cy001]

很好呀!價錢要6千多元.

[Tai Man Lam]

Canon kit Lens出名質素差，如果預算許可，梗係買L鏡好Ｄ啦。

[chisinchai]

好似買支tamron a16 好似實際d wo......
實在又抵爽好食^^
d人話對焦有問題....但係我用係350d 到...真係超準wo... 用番canon原廠鏡都冇咁準...我支係made in japan o既

[cy001]

18-55 F2.8 IS 是眏到去L級,只是無防塵防滴,這支LEN初出要8千幾

[iCatchU]

is there any a16 not "made in japan"?
thanks

[hungjacky]

甘如果用10-22同17-40L鏡, 宜家考慮緊e兩支...