近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
suffocating
註冊: 2007-09-20
上載我的肖像
|
[400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 20 日 |
|
|
點影都係好夢幻
請各師兄幫幫手
- 支鏡係Sigma 17-70
- 部機個Sharpness已經set 左Standard sharpness+2
- 對焦正常
- ISO快門光圈等 setting 同我用細機差不多
感激不盡 !!
|
|
|
|
 |
galleo
註冊: 2003-08-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 20 日 |
|
|
i think most people here will give u the same reply as i do....
Can you post the pics out??
= )
|
|
|
|
 |
suffocating
註冊: 2007-09-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 20 日 |
|
|
sure! i will come back later
Thanks!!
|
|
|
|
 |
nemsis
註冊: 2006-02-17
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 20 日 |
|
|
盡可能使用較小的光圈吧
很多鏡頭在光圈全開時未必有太好的效成像
籍此提升四角甚至整體的分析力
如果效果仍不如理想的話最經濟的做法就是以軟件作後期加工
甚至以RAW形式紀錄以增加調整的彈性
雖不是Canon的User
但小第都試過以朋友借來的400D配以KIT Lens收細光圈後
再加以RAW後期以PS Camera RAW 推高一點銳利度
都能得出不錯的效果
|
|
|
|
 |
cy001
註冊: 2007-08-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 20 日 |
|
|
映raw,再用canon那給software推高sharpless,一定做到你要.
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
1. test with FLASH *to minimize the handshake problem
2. test backfocus problem
http://photo.net/learn/focustest/
if u can get 1. sharp => try to shoot with f8/11 ON A TRIPOD
if u cannot get 1 sharp, u will discover that u may have backfocus problem
if u can get 1 sharp & no back focus problem, that may be your own problem
please see
http://visual-vacations.com/Photography/focus-recompose_sucks.htm
|
|
|
|
 |
joneslee
註冊: 2003-11-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
唔駛試啦, 一於拎部機去返canon 整啦. 我識人用呢部機嘅個個都係咁.........都係呢個問題....最後都係要拎返去整...整完就sharp 番......都唔明canon 每次出機都有呢個問題..但又唔去改善......
|
|
|
|
 |
cy001
註冊: 2007-08-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
是不是只在副廠才出現這問題,是要回廠CAL鏡,是不是?
|
|
|
|
 |
orabuln
註冊: 2004-12-23
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
我覺得400d 唔係太差...
photoshop cs3 resize / 100% crop 直出...
機無(專登) set sharpness....
按圖放大
按圖放大
|
|
|
|
 |
hanny
註冊: 2006-02-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
no need to return canon cs to check
becasue normally canon people use raw
it is far away sharp than jpeg
if you are using kid lens you can try at f5.6 ~f8 is better
normaly if the aperture set to big like f2.8 you have to sure than you focus to some big flat area than is ok
and also the picture look soft becasue the disign for support the canon
printer
but you can see the follow picture this is direct photo jpeg
is it sharp enough ??
|
|
|
|
 |
hanny
註冊: 2006-02-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
it is shoot by 50mm f1.4 and flash 580ex 400d
|
|
|
|
 |
McDonald
註冊: 2003-07-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
Are you sure it's direct jpeg output? No post processed by Photoshop?
|
|
|
|
 |
steve yan
註冊: 2007-03-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
I have read almost all Canon reviews at dpreview.com and had not noticed the sharpness issue for jpeg image. I also have read a lot of messages from Canon fans, and almost all praised Canon images both jpeg and raw, but quite a few of above messages suggested that one should shoot raw and PP for sharper images. Or, Canon users always shoot raw and PP for better sharpness etc. Does this imply that Canon produced not very good jpeg images without PP??? Quite strange to me. I would believe a more reasonable answer: the camera in question needs to be checked by Canon since no one can quarantee 100% satisfactory QC, including Canon.
|
|
|
|
 |
joneslee
註冊: 2003-11-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
但點解拎返CANON 調教過之後又sharp 番? 點解釋?
如果吓吓要用f/8 - 11先sharp...點解要買單鏡機, 點解要買canon機? 唔通貪佢d相大光圈時夠夢幻.....可能唔係部部有呢個問題, 但有呢個問題嘅機都幾多.....如果成日諗住佢有冇問題, 不如趁仲係保修期內, 點解唔拎返去check check 呢?
|
|
|
|
 |
hanny
註冊: 2006-02-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: [400D]新手求助: 相唔夠sharp Post time: 9 月 21 日 |
|
|
McDonald
i was reside
and +3 for warm
+3 for contract
no + sharpness
becasue + sharpness the pixes will be bad
but this picture still direct photo jpeg not by raw
|
|
|
|
 |
|