[Walker^.^]

[cy001]

我知正呀,我都用緊

[Walker^.^]

有冇人用緊Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS
影出來好似麻麻地咁嘅??

[gwu1]

pictures are so good.

[Walker^.^]

[latewind]

Walker 師兄:

請問貼出相片用甚麼鏡頭? 這點十分重要!

[Walker^.^]

latewind:

兩幅貓貓係Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
其餘都係Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS

[peterchan04]

第1, 2 張相 立體感幾好.

如果 canon 枝 efs 17-55mm f2.8 定價平些...
做 kit lens 吾錯.

[bb1032003]

walker^.^,

I will consider those photos from Sigma 18-200 is not bad, give the range of this type of zoom and you use f3.5.

Just a little opinion, it is better to use smaller apeture for this kind of photos unless you purposely use larger apeture to standout somethings.

By the way, if you use smaller apeture you can use higher iso to compensate the lower shutter speed + OS you can increase your photo opportunity.

What particular problem you consider in those photos ? Don't compare with 50 1.8 even it only cost you $600 it is very sharp after f2.8. It can beat a lot of higher price lens.

[Kingsize]

大埔火車站個幅,右上D樹起哂紫邊,左上屋邊頂位有色差。

對下個幅左邊株樹右邊位走紅色色差,左邊位走綠色色差。

對下個幅亦一樣,機主自己慢慢研究一下。

[Walker^.^]

Kingsize師兄：

請問點樣可以避免呢??
請指導一下小弟^.^

[Piclike]

都是鏡頭問題la.好機要配靚鏡,再加三,四倍$

[gwu1]

to me, the pictures are very good. i am not as good as other brothers in terms of appreciating photos.

seems that the exposure detection or metering of 40D is much better than 400D. i always find the exposure by 400D is not good when compared with 40D.

i should not look at pics from 40D anymore. otherwise, i could not resist buying 40D.

[Winsome993]

hello walker,

i just bought the 40D also do u have any 人像, 風景 w/ 淺景深 etc when using sigma 18-200 OS that u can post up? i am really interest in this lens but wanted to see more pics, MANY THANKS

[hanny]

sigma 18-200 OS

this lens not exellant but quite good

you can think about this

i bought it in mk some shop water hkd3680.00