[gwu1]

thanks for sharing the useful and interesting review.

[peterchan04]

sony A700 剛剛 出左個 firmware 2.0v update....

upgrade 之後.... 冇人夠佢 fight.... ??



.

[steve yan]

Interesting information. Believe one should bear in mind always, however, that high ISO should only be regarded as a by-product of digital photography. One would find it strange that when certain cameras boast their high ISO performance, how often would we use high ISO for general photography when normal ISO's (say 100-400) be workable? Remember also, back to film years, 400 was already a high ISO and not many general users would take. I am not saying an effective high ISO is a useless feature, but its importance should not be too exagerated when one picks a certain model. Certainly peepers or paparazzi may be exceptions.

[peterchan04]

Using iso 1600, iso 3200 everyday.

With telephoto lenses (200mm, 300mm...), high ISOs become very very usefull and handy when covering indoor events like basketball games, table tennis, theatres, chinese operas (where flashlights are not welcome or not very effective at a distance ).


Kodak used to have very high quality ISO1250 films.... excellent for shooting indoor stage performances. Expensive but some people used them everyday.

[White owl]

真想快D睇下D300低雜訊既利害,

[peter_]

可以睇得出sony真係有心搞好dslr, 在noise control, 對焦速度/準確度, 及機身防震等的躍進可見一班, 當然KM的技術亦是一大原因.

[pongyee]

With high ISO, you don't have to invest on expensive fast lenses,

though a faster lens is always benefited by one more f/stop.