[sumlovephoto]

Pansonic LX2
Canon G9

我是新手
想買一部可以手動的機好好學攝影
所以買了以後短時間內都不會轉機

以上2部如何抉擇??
價錢差不多
點揀呀??點揀呀??點揀呀??

[surewin8686]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[feet]

to me G9

[barryspc]

如果想好好學攝影，又不會常轉機，個人覺得DSLR會較好

入門的 Canon 350D or Nikon D40 是不錯的選擇

[靚蝦王]

我用緊lx-2 , 當然 choose lx-2 啦, 原因係因為 g-9quality 又唔好得過dslr, 但價錢 同size 就可以同d 細dslr比, 買佢我買多部細既1dslr唔係更好咩?
買lx-2 當然唔係話佢quality 好過 dslr, 但係size就非dslr 可比, 建議你加入
Ricoh GX100 一齊考慮~

[Banon]

LX2 o既ISO 400或以上好多noise,

影紅色重會有一撻撻黑色!!!

G9好D.

[RaymondYuen]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[DCJerk]

LX2有28mm, 淨係呢樣都夠喇, 況且其他都唔係咁差, G9都唔錯, 但加上廣角鏡就比較貴la.
睇吓你需唔需要28mm喇

[els2]

I perfer LX-2 because quality of len is very good, moreover, it has 28mm len which is very suitable for taking natural scene as well as life snap shot. Though noise issue shoudl still be concern when shooting in dark place. But personally I don;t think G9 can perform much better on noise reduction. (that what we should admire is we can;t expect too much on noise improvement when size of CCD is such small.

If you like snap shot: LX2
If you always take picture in dark area: G9 should be a bit better on noise control
If you like compact size: LX-2
Lens concern: LX-2
fast operation: both are fast but G9 is more user friendly
White balance accurancy: that' the poorest part of LX-2 but manual WB setting is excellent feature that we only found on DSLR

If you need high quality picture on 5000 budget... I would like to suggest you to consider a DSLR. coz price is very near to G9 but quality is much better than any compact DC.

Finally what I wanna remind here is: paraelle import price of LX-2 is only HK$2,780-2,980... that's very valuable.

[barryspc]

28mm wide on LX2 只在16:9 模式時可用


4:3 or 3:2 (曬相比例) LX2 和 G9 分別不大，都係35mm

這也是我一直沒有買lx1/lx2 的原因

[sumlovephoto]

我刀有考慮過dslr
but佢太大部喇
唔太方便

多謝你地既意見
本來想買g9
睇完你地既opinion之後
又想買lx2 tim....
真係好難揀..

[恐怖份子]

G9行貨都係under $3700,幾抵買
而且有face detection
雖然最平DSLR+kit鏡都係4XXX,但相對於G9,真係大好多,好唔方便
如果想要28mm,買FZ18,但很大部

[kt_kt]

@@請問恐怖份子
在哪買3700
超級想買g9

>>G9行貨都係under $3700,幾抵買
>>而且有face detection
>>雖然最平DSLR+kit鏡都係4XXX,但相對於G9,真係大好多,好唔方便
>>如果想要28mm,買FZ18,但很大部

[KL3]

咁lx2 定 fujifilm f50fd 好d?

[johnykw]

我公司都有LX2 & G9兩部機, 兩部機功能明顯G9功能多好多, 影像質素, LX2相比起G9嗰部係Sharp d, 但顏色就G9好d, 如果我揀我會揀G9, 因為我司以用Raw格式拍完後, 再用電腦調Sharp d, 但顏色就好難調番正色! 而拍夜景, 不朽都係Panasonic嘅弱項, Noise係ISO 400明顯比G9多d!

以下係我分享個人感受: (但我仲未買G9, 但又好想買!)
我本人用開5D, 所以對我黎講G9係一部好輕便好細部嘅數碼傻瓜機, 用開Canon野有信心, 其實我都好鐘意Lieca鏡, 但Panasonic CCD真係唔得就唔得, 所以G9恰到好處, 鏡與CCD取得良好平衡.
上面有人講到G9畫質不如DSLR, 呢點我都不大認同, 我係公司試過400d & G9, 雖然400d Cmos尺寸大過 G9 CCD, 但因為G9 有1200萬像素, 所以可以彌保CCD尺寸細過400d cmos! 當然單反機容易拍到淺景深, 夜景較少雜訊, 呢d G9就比唔到你, 但你要我出街攞部400d, 氏起G9大部好多, 因為我通常會配支 Canon F2.8 24-70mm L鏡(標準鏡), 所以對我而言, 我寧願攞部G9出街! 真係輕好多!

最多比個網址你地參考:
G9 VS 5D
http://www.thecleverest.com/blog/281