[ultraman99]

隔離話主流是 3M and 4M, 但仍有很多買 MZ3 (i.e 2M)

何解 ?

[wwon001]

3M entry level now

[道 明 寺]

I think it depands on the price but not the pixel. If the economy grow is fast or the DC price drops, more people would buy more advanced model.

[man24]

200萬只係出到5r, 想曬8r就真係好勉強啦...

[jackngai]

2mp 出5R 都已經勉強啦, 1600 x 1200 , 要曬 7 x 5吋, 直度都係得240dpi,
3mp 就fit 晒 , 有 300 dpi...

[noodle]

not only the pixel, also depend on other functions .eg movie , manual function , quality of photo

[frankyso]

所以都係視乎個人需要囉．．．

[Velsper]

眼看很多人用的還是1024x768
4mp又有何用?

[道 明 寺]

I usually use 3M pixels or below because I do not need 8R photos and also the file size is smaller (around 1.1MB or below). I think many of us select 3M pixels or below only although the DC can be set at higher resolution. Am I Right?

[Velsper]

小弟還想:
通常用細size因為唔駛咁麻煩(resize)
容易d係電腦睇同send比人
^ ^
印大相,老實說,一般也沒幾多機會.

[sansan2000]

我自己就好少晒相, 就算有都係晒4R. 5R, 8R 咁貴, 有幾多人會張張哂到咁大呀. 但既然係4M 機又唔係好貴, 咁緊係買4M機啦.

[kith613]

the size of Card is also a problem if all pictures are in 4M

[gapman]

I agree ! My friend said if they buy a 4M DC, they will used 4M to take photos ! But in my opinion, if just develop 3R or 4R photos, then I don't see any big difference for using 2M or 4M to take photos !

[sevensister]

雖然話 pixel 高會佔多d ram又無乜機會晒咁大張
但係高d可以有多d位裁相喎
高 pixel 有佢既必要

不過愈高 pixel 唔代表愈 detail
事關而家 ccd /cmos 採光都唔係
single pixel resolution 及 single pixel colour
仲要交比 ADC 做反鋸齒
所以 lost 都幾大..(特別係綠色)
相反 FOVEON X3 CCD 無呢 d 問題
因為暫時得佢係 single pixel resolution 及 single pixel colour

唔係賣廣告
用 FOVEON X3 CCD 既 Sigma SD9 (3MP) CCD 畫質上 fight 低左
Nikon D100 (6mp ccd) 同 Canon D60 (6MP)
一晒 40" 直度時高下立見

所以愈高 pixel 唔代表愈 detail

小弟淺見, 如有錯請各位大大力批評及指正

[Velsper]

>>用 FOVEON X3 CCD 既 Sigma SD9 (3MP) CCD 畫質上 fight 低左
Nikon D100 (6mp ccd) 同 Canon D60 (6MP)
一晒 40" 直度時高下立見

所以愈高 pixel 唔代表愈 detail

先回這個
X3有3MP * 3 = 9MP
有9百萬像實際感光原件啊~~
是比D100多了3MP來記錄 ^ ^


其實多像素相4R相是有"一定的"作用的
小弟也會用最大像素來記錄
但人們唔用多像素記錄小弟只想到
人們不會想"後製"相片
乾脆就用細d來記錄了