近日收到不少網友意見,指 DCFever.com「吹水閒聊」充斥愈來愈多粗言穢語、人身攻擊、誹謗等不理性討論。作為 一個以攝影興趣為主題的網站,此等漫罵式討論已超出 DCFever.com 設立討論區之原意。DCFever.com 呼籲大家以 攝影交流為目的作理性討論,並正密切留意事態的發展。
上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
PKYAN
註冊: 2003-04-22
上載我的肖像
|
40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 6 日 |
|
|
各位師兄,小弟剛買咗40d+17-40.個原廠hood好鬼大,攞出街唔方便.
想問一下個hood係咪design俾FF機用?
APS-C 機係咪用唔用都冇分別?
THANKS!
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 6 日 |
|
|
PKYAN,
Yes, the hood is for FF body you may try to use the hood for 24-105 (you can buy China made product in SSP) which can fit in 17-40 but more useful on 40D.
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 6 日 |
|
|
sugarhk & PKYAN,
There will be no black corners for hood of 24-105 on 17-40 with 40D as 17 x 1.6 = 27.2mm so when you use 24-105 hood it is design for 24 mm on full frame therefore NO black corners on APS-C bodies!!
|
|
|
|
 |
ckh3hk
註冊: 2007-07-13
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 6 日 |
|
|
sugar兄
有道理~
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 6 日 |
|
|
Upon request photo of EW-83H on 17-40
|
|
|
|
 |
gwu1
註冊: 2007-09-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
bb1032003,
is it the case that the hood only helps when the sun is in front of you?
or does it also help in other situation?
i have a hood which comes with my 70-200mm. when should i use the hood? or should i always put on the hood?
thank you.
|
|
|
|
 |
kingkonghk
註冊: 2003-01-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
嫌硬膠hood太大, 可以自己print個出來, 要用o個時先用膠紙黐
|
|
|
|
 |
kingkonghk
註冊: 2003-01-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
拿~~~
http://www.lenshoods.co.uk/
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
I used EW-83H with 17-40 on 350D, no problem wor!
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
gwu1,
Long time no 'talk'.
As ditigal sensor is more sensitive to glare and lower contrast than film so any other unwanted light sources will affect the quality of the picture more serious than film.
I personally always put the hood on, you have already paid for it why don't you use it and it is useful as well. Unless you want to have special effect on your photos caused by glare or to reduce the contrast.
|
|
|
|
 |
peterchan04
註冊: 2004-11-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
呢 d 大 hood 吾想用 收鬼埋佢 啦....
用 內 閃 有 佢 就 黑 左 一半.
|
|
|
|
 |
gwu1
註冊: 2007-09-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
bb1032003,
yes, we paid for it already. i will try to use the hood to see the effect. sometimes i feel it is too bulky to carry.
there is another problem. i don't know whether you have come across this kind of problem or situation. i took some landscape pics in one afternoon on a hill. it was sunny. some of them appeared a bit reddish, just a little bit. i don't know whether it is because of the auto white balance effect or because of my Tamron lens. i suspect it is whte balance, right?
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
gwu1,
If you use auto white balance it will have some incidental that the white balance is not accurate, you may use sunny white balance instead of auto.
Learn to shoot in RAW and you can play around with all those settings in DPP whatever you want, even it shoot by Tamron.
|
|
|
|
 |
bb1032003
註冊: 2006-12-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 40D 用 17-40 需唔需要用 hood Post time: 12 月 7 日 |
|
|
I am not sure which body used in 17-40 with the 83H hood on it and have light lost on 17mm.
I check it on 400D with 17-40 and hood 83H, I am not able to discover any different at all ie. NO light lost not in 17mm and not in 40mm
May be 40D are different.
|
|
|
|
 |
|