[ballawong]

有無brother or some foreign website comapre it seriuously?

其實無14bit d相都可以好靚je

[phoebus_hk]

我都想知其實12-bit 同14-bit既分別係咪真係咁大!

[hanny]

but if there are 2 camera that nearly the same price

you will choice a new 14bit one or old 12bit one ??

[kingkonghk]

用來影JPEG分別唔到

[hanny]

jpeg lose a lot of detail so 14bit and 12bit are not much different

but if you deeply use the machine you will become want to use the more advance one

[maninnet]

用 14 bit 可以記錄更豐富的層次, 對 RGB 每一點來說, 電腦上用的 true color, 只是 8X8x8 rgb 共 24 bit color.
某些顯示較差的 lcd, 如手機, 只能用 16 bit color. 但已相當足夠.
對 jpeg 來說, 完全沒有分別. 對 raw 來說, 暫時沒有分別, 但難保將來的設備更加先進, 多保存一點資訊, 總有用處.

[kingkonghk]

有好過冇

[vaworld]

好多時呢d唔係真正硬體加兩bit color depth, 只係"軟體模擬"多兩bit.
而且都未必一定多bit 好過少bit, 多兩bit 可能只係 gimmick, 無實際增益.
舊時玩開 scanner 就知, 有d牌子/model多兩bit color depth scanner 可能重差過另一隻model少兩bit.

[cclee001]

Windows display出既相只有8bits, 如果有14bits姐話多左6bits.

用途1: (用raw影)
- 明明爆光既有可能救得反

------------------------
舊時玩開 scanner 就知, 有d牌子/model多兩bit color depth scanner 可能重差過另一隻model少兩bit
- 比較兩部機當然唔係只係睇bits數. 我諗唔係因為bits多左而差左, 而係果隻牌子差

[vaworld]

我想講並唔係bit 數高會差, 只係講 bit 數高唔代表質數好.
一部 scanner 主要睇 sensor/light source質素而唔係 bit數.
數碼相機亦都一樣主要係 ccd/cmos加 processing engine 質素高低.
如果單單係靠軟體提升 bit 數, 實際上現在 retouching software都可以做得到.
dynamic range 要加2bits 即是要提升4倍! 世界上那有這樣便宜的事!?

[hanny]

every machine was a little bit change since the dslr appear

you can see from the starting of dslr to now a day the picture graphic is far away diiferent
becasue of each model little bit upgrade

so anyway 有好過冇 is right!!!

[kuilam]

就是4096同16384的分別，哈哈哈！

[kingkonghk]

有d人又鐘意o係數碼世界上, 搵返d error出來, 例如hifi友, 鍾意sacd+膽機

[Hubs]

IMHO, Japanese manufacturers have the habit of digging into very minor details. The bits issue, like pixel count, is more of a marketing gimmick that looks good on the spec sheet, than an improvement that can be seen and appreciated by the majority of photographers.

[hauchi]

主要係放大相時,暗位靚好如果4R唔多分唔到