[bush0525]

Sigma 18-50 hsm,
f2.8

18mm
[IMG]http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t139/bush0525/18-28-1.jpg[/IMG]

24mm
[IMG]http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t139/bush0525/24-28-1.jpg[/IMG]

28mm
[IMG]http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t139/bush0525/28-28-1.jpg[/IMG]

35mm
[IMG]http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t139/bush0525/35-28-1.jpg[/IMG]

50mm
[IMG]http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t139/bush0525/50-28-1.jpg[/IMG]

[kuilam]

18mm
http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t139/bush0525/18-28-1.jpg

[kuilam]

18mm

[kuilam]

[kingkonghk]

唔覺

[maximilianyuen]

覺 -.-

focus point looks like at around 0.1~ 0.2 close to the lens....

but your shot is not good, maybe you should take a more accurate shot right in front of this paper model...
now the left side is closer to the camera than the right side

[怪俠]

係喎！真係好覺，右邊焦走緊D去左邊咁

[kingkonghk]

>>focus point looks like at around 0.1~ 0.2 close to the lens....

唔係水平影, 係咁架喎

[maximilianyuen]

so ask him to take a better shot to confirm :)

[yung2]

呢d咭仔真係害人不淺, 搞到好多人都以為自己支鏡走焦~

[iso_ray]

我腳得如果無打錯位( multi focusing point 箭咀對上條線) 就係有蕉點前移

但我睇到有3張打既位置好似唔同, 比較似set好位,對好焦後用雞腳而未有留意雞腳/台扑前問題, 不如將test paper同部機一齊放係枱上試過仲好啦
( 當然部機要薦野啦)

[maximilianyuen]

>>>>呢d咭仔真係害人不淺, 搞到好多人都以為自己支鏡走焦~

whats the best way to test 走焦 then? I am not good at paper work so didn't make it lol

[yung2]

咁試法只會令自己神經衰弱, 成日疑神疑鬼覺得支鏡有問題,

想知支鏡有無問題最好拎番俾原廠試.

如果咁樣搵張咭試到, 咁拉卡鏡就唔洗支支用儀器試完先ok先出廠.

[kingkonghk]

>>whats the best way to test 走焦 then? I am not good at paper work so didn't make it lol

影住隻蕉, 過一晚夜, 第日仲見佢o係度就即係冇走蕉

[真丹尼爾]

>>影住隻蕉, 過一晚夜, 第日仲見佢o係度就即係冇走蕉

哈哈，會會俾師兄你偷食咗？...................^^