[vicvic_1121]

本身諗緊panasonic fx 520 同fuji F100...
fx520 貪佢有手動... 光圈&快門先決....
F100 貪佢質素好過fx520....

但係睇睇下.... 發現原來仲有部LX2....D spec都幾合我心水....
有手動... 光圈&快門先決之餘....CCD仲同F100差不多.... 又見D 評價唔錯....

但係LX2 都出左就快2年.... 而家先黎買會唔會好out 呢?
相比起fx520 & F100 佢反應係咪好慢呢??
佢唔支援SDHC 緊唔緊要呢??

唔好意思... 好多問題....唔該晒!!

[maximilianyuen]

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1013&thread=27892470

[yung2]

依家買咪好囉, 平d~

[cheatcheat]

通常唔係架機out左囉~

[fatfat0302]

out是指那方面?
指新功能? (<- 對你係咪真係有用)

反應與其它DC機仔比是唔慢...
Panasonic LX2 是一部好機 , LX2的片相質素是非常靚 , 只是Panasonic 機在高ISO時會有多noise , 其實大部份DC機仔都係 , 只有Fujifilm FinePix FD series較少noise , 但高ISO令相片質素降低...
LX2有得用RAW影 , 相片後期修改好有用...

呢d網寫的spec是經常錯 , 睇spec係要去原廠網睇 , LX2係支援SDHC :
http://www.panasonic.hk/av/chinese/dc/feature_page.asp?f_product_category=3&f_sub_category=0&f_product_record_id=192

[vicvic_1121]

我唔係指新功能呀.. 我對touch screen 完全零興趣... 只係覺得而家先黎買2年前o既機好似怪怪地咁...

太好喇... 原來support SDHC.... 我更加鍾意呢部機喇咁...

我其實之前係用canon 350d... 鍾意佢咩都有得set... 但係就嫌佢比較大部(對於女仔黎講)... 唔夠輕便.... 好少帶佢出街喇... 只係去旅行先會帶... 我黎緊去日本旅行... 更加唔想帶住咁大部機....我終於上星期賣左俾個朋友... 諗住換部機仔... 但係見其他dc 好多都冇光圈&快門先決... 覺得硬係爭d野咁... 見到LX2 真係2眼發光呀....

多謝咁多位呀!!!

[maximilianyuen]

won't consider GX100?

[ericng0330]

我覺得唔會out，因為佢係部好機，最大問題就係noise問題
我自己都有一部，我都等左成年先買，買左無後悔過，我會保留佢，唔會賣
平時就會拎佢出街，有時間先會用單反機

[intouch]

講真.真係幾out...而家買返兩年前既科技.仲要咁貴.....話唔定買左一兩個月就出.lx3..

[intouch]

一係就等佢出左lx3先買...咁會平好多

[fatfat0302]

最重要係相片質素好, 性能岩用, 又適合自己用, 須要用咪買...理得佢out 唔out...

[yung2]

LX2相對350D係細左好多, 但同一般DC仔比,

佢又凸左個鏡頭出來, 話佢細其實又唔係好細,

加上都係要開鏡頭蓋, 呢樣亦係比一般DC煩o既地方,

買之前要諗埋接唔接受到呢兩個缺點.

[maximilianyuen]

I sold my LX2 for GRD2

the one big problem is LX2 don't give you real raw file
the RAW from LX2 is post-processed which rather lost the meaning of giving you the RAW file...

LX2 is a good camera, but look back at this moment is rather insufficient

[靚蝦王]

RAW file唔係話部機唔做任何processing架~
raw file d processing 可以用solftware改咁解~~
就算你用任何以 dc/dslr, 都會俾你改color/saturation/ nr 既 setting 架~
我常用lx-2 raw, 因為個人唔太like 佢內置既nr, 但換黎既問題係因為file太大, 佢冇用d compressed raw, 所以2gb先影得82張 ....... 另一個問題係因為大file, 所以save都要一d時間, 即係話連拍就唔好用raw ..............

不過因為呢部機常都係for 我日常生活, 所以對我黎講冇問題~ 我亦非常like呢部機~

我自己就已經賣左 lx-2 黎等lx-3 ~

[maximilianyuen]

well, not intend to argue
but i dont think u understand

anyway, LX2 give u a heavily processed RAW file, esp on noise reduction
which is irreversible and defeatt the purpose of having RAW

also, LX2 don't have any mount that give you freedom to add filter/ extension lens and so on

i have told the reason why i sold my LX2, if vicvic_1121 think its ok, then go for it. no one can say its a wrong decision, just if i were u i wont buy it now.