[wongcheukyin]

我用的是450D...有18-55IS和55-250L
請問如果想換掉KIT 鏡．．買１７－４０Ｌ好定２４－１０５好呢
我平時多數影景，同間唔中影街頭生活照．．
我睇過之前師兄的ＰＯＳＴ．．．都未決定到＞＜
如果２４－１０５Ｌ用係４５０Ｄ．就會唔係好够ＷＩＤＥ，但係佢個
ＲＡＮＧＥ　真係好正．．
所以唔該各位師兄幫下忙．．．ＴＨＸ

[ym_y4]

wongcheukyin 兄,
主要看 閣下拍什麼類型的照片多,
以450D的鏡頭 1.6倍計,
17-40 ( 相當於135mm相機的28-76 )
可以影風景至人像,
若為24-105 (相當於135mm相機的39-170),
則影近的不夠闊,
影遠的又不很遠,
以本人喜好則傾向17-40,
當然可以再闊些和遠些就更好.

[yiu_hei]

55-250L<<<<打錯字小心

比我都係17-40

~.~我覺得24105光圈太細~所以呢個蕉距我會買24-70

但1740影景多數收光圈所以無乜分別~

[mk07]

17-40招牌一定定買~wongcheukyin

[gwu1]

For myself, 24mm is too narrow for landscape. You can try buying using 24mm only on your kit lens, but not wider. Then you will know whether you need 17mm. If you then find that you need wider than 24mm, the answer is to get 17-40mm f4L. It is a great lens for landscape on my 450D.

[wongcheukyin]

多謝各位師兄先..我想我都係可能會買17-40L..
我想我都唔會咁快上FF...所以呢一支幾岩我...THX^^

[gwu1]

１７－４０Ｌ，ＦＦ都啱用架！

[wongcheukyin]

我知17-40L可以用係FF...
但係如果用係FF的17-40L就唔係標準鏡而係一支超廣角鏡
我用17-40L係450D..身上主要都係當一支標準鏡黎用．．
如果我用ＦＦ．．咁又要買多一支標準鏡．．咁就煩Ｄ
所以先會講”我暫時都唔會上去ＦＦ住”
但係都多謝師兄指出呢一個重點（我都係因為１７－４０Ｌ可以上ＦＦ機先買）．．ＴＨＸ

[fish30d]

May I suggest an alternative: 16-35 f2.8L, if budget allows, MkII, if budget not allows, than Mk I

OK, it is more expensive then 17-40 f4L, a 2nd hand Mk I will cost you around $6,000, but you won;t regret buying it! The main reason why I suggest this is because if you take it to travel, f4 is not enough, whereas f2.8 will allow you to take photos indoor! On a 450D, you can set the ISO to 800 and and f2.8 you can take photos indoor in almost all circumstances.

[White owl]

兩枝買晒佢!!!

[JSmith]

正路係應該買17-40，24-105用FF先至啱駛
將來轉FF，17-40回復返一支超廣角，當然你要再買一支standard zoom。24-105都係好選擇。

結論：買晒兩支

[wongcheukyin]

我都係咁樣PLAN我的買鏡計劃^^
而家見到FISH30D兄.提議好似都唔錯波><
我係唔想問L鏡係二手市場容唔容易賣返出去GA??

[fish30d]

Very easy to sell! That's why you must buy the best!

[JSmith]

我又唔係咁同意fish30d既講法喎，16-35 mk I 太舊，唔係咁適合數碼機。mk II又好貴，配1.6X 又唔夠tele...2.8光圈對於旅行唔係咁重要，慳返啲錢買閃燈重好

[fish30d]

17-40 500g; 16-35 600g

1.6x 40 vs 35, difference is only 8mm in real term

Add a flash? How heavy is 430EX? I think definitely heavier than 100g

Not enough tele, but is 8mm going to make that much difference when travelling? Besides, the author already has 55-250