[rickwok]

屋企既老人家去旅行影相，乜都吾識，吾知點解部機校左100萬像素，拎去曬4R，重要好cheap的$0.7一張。

琴日睇相，發現完全收貨，吾講你都吾知得100萬像素。(當然以生活相計)

我一直以來都同人講高象素無乜用(生活相)，300萬乜都夠，但真係估吾倒原來都錯，100萬都夠了。

吾信，不彷請你親身試一次，真係吾覺有分別。

未試過，希望閣下吾好「反對」，淨係自以為是(好似我以前咁)

**重申：以生活相的一般要求。

[maximilianyuen]

1 Megapix? that too much for a 4R

you just need 600X400 for a "以生活相的一般要求" photo print out

and the maximum you need is 1800x1200, 300dpi
any bigger file help nothing on better quality

and "重要好cheap的$0.7一張。"
my best photos are developed at $0.4 each.

>>>未試過，希望閣下吾好「反對」，淨係自以為是
last but not least, but don't be so arrogant and think that the whole world are the same level as you.

but its glad to know there is one less idiot in this world

[maximilianyuen]

Olympus E100RS, 1.3 megapixels

[kingkonghk]

100萬曬4r可接受係可以理解, 理論上要200萬先充分發揮到4r o既解釋度

[tam_dominic]

信不信由你：

300萬像素 晒 12" X 18" 相 掛在牆觀賞都好靚.

[kingkonghk]

放入水中都會好靚

[kingkonghk]

中文定英文報紙?

廣告定phone月版先?

[kingkonghk]

點知你個報紙名係唔係叫"中 文 報 紙" o既英文報呀....

[王迦南]

4R = 4 x 6 x 300dpi =720,000像素，仲未用盡100萬像素哩！同貴價高像素機應該冇乜分別。


我去吳哥用400萬像素的Canon ixus i，曬8R都得。而且唔係生活相質素，誇張d講係貼堂質素。

[kingkonghk]

4"x6"x300dpi, 點解會係720000?

[王迦南]

鎖你，計錯數。

4R = 4 x 6 x 300dpi x 300dpi = 720,000

[王迦南]

又錯！

的確係2,160,000。

因此應該係用200dpi，理論上質素稍差。

[kingkonghk]

咪係囉, 蘋果日報都係冇蘋果架

[fa77le]

得架.....我未懂事個陳.......用部好架勢既手機影左30萬象素相去晒


都ok .....喎....


所以100萬像素已經好架勢架啦

[kingkonghk]

唔係唔得, 1象素都冇問題架, 不過用唔盡相紙解釋度之嘛