[arlok107]

~係幾多mm?

有無相睇下?

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[王迦南]

[pongyee]

咁似紙紥舖貨辦？

[王迦南]

Sure!

佢地基本上冇乜分別，都係送上天上的！

[~metal~]

似 BBQ 用石紙燴番鼠

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[王迦南]

不過蝦勃似乎唔夠這枝屎不知咁勁揪，因為蝦勃已經係八十年代既古董，屎不知係03年新発売。

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[pongyee]

>> 屎不知係03年新発売。

呢支硬膠好多，唔似紙紥。

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[pongyee]

其實上面果兩碌算唔算係鏡頭？ 裡面有冇 lens？

[d2c]

會員戶口已被刪除，資料已被標示為不顯示

[Nailimixam]

>>>屎 上 最 長 應 該 係 ......
大 蝦 勃 起 望 軟 鏡

Don't think so :P
the only advantage on Hubble is that it's in Space and won't have the air turbulence problem that makes the stars flick

limited by the Rocket/Space Shuttler lifting capacity Hubble and whatever scope in space's size and functionality is severely limited I guess

the longest lenses should be E-ELT, which is "capable of picking out the weak pinpricks of light that are reflected from planets as they orbit stars."
and/or " if astronomers were to use it to peer at the Moon, they would be able to see the car sized lunar rover that was left on the moon by astronauts during the Apollo missions."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/space/5104408/Worlds-largest-telescope-will-search-heavens-for-habitable-planets-like-Earth.html