[canonG3]

我的FD試過,會起格仔,想買A70黎哂8R相,掂唔掂

[jesse_lkh]

好唔掂 ~
起碼我接受唔到

[canonG3]

咁400萬像素得唔得?

[dclkwok]

大佬呀, 普通菲林傻瓜機哂8R相都唔掂喇, 點可以要求咁高!!

[Ranma]

那...傻瓜機哂8R相都唔掂？
那點先惦呀？
一定要過萬蚊部機先惦？？

[canonG3]

回應：dclkwok
細佬呀, 普通菲林傻瓜機哂唔到8R相? 你無事呀?

[fukadakak]

640x480 約30萬像素 用途: 電郵傳送相片 , Powerpoint文件等
800x600 約48萬像素 用途: 15"全螢幕WALLPAPER
1024x768 約78萬像素 用途: 17"全螢幕WALLPAPER
1600x1280 約200萬像素 用途: 彩色打印A6相片 約4R
2048x1536 約310萬像素 用途: 彩色打印A4相片 約 8R
2560x1920 約500萬像素 用途: 彩色打印A3相片 約 11X14

[dclkwok]

response to canonG3.

This is very subjective and depends on one's level of acceptance. 8R developed from conventional fully automatic camera is not acceptable to me but may be acceptable to you.

response to ranma.

the answer to your last question is "yes" for digital camera - DSLR - for me only.

conclude from the above, that's why I always throw the 8R free coupon straight away. You could not expect a Honda Civic gives you a F350's performance.

see fukadakak's fair comment. It's still acceptable to print 8R from 310 m-pixels.

P.S. this is a discussion forum for sharing experience, not a place for argument!

[Ranma]

耶...假如照常規的話~
菲林的解像度~
還比千多萬像素數碼相機還高吧！
光學會受限制嗎？^^""
最多得出來的效果...
是相機的質素問題...(傻瓜機也未必一定是差啊！)

[新仔~]

那麼如果我話 : 300萬像素的dc, 同普通傻瓜菲林相機哂出來的8R相, 質素差不多(acceptable與否就視乎大家觀點與角度啦~), 這樣對嗎???

(我都好想知300萬的dc夠唔夠用~~)

[新仔~]

那麼如果我話 : 300萬像素的dc, 同普通傻瓜菲林相機哂出來的8R相, 質素差不多(acceptable與否就視乎大家觀點與角度啦~), 這樣對嗎???

(我都好想知300萬的dc夠唔夠用~~)

[handsome138]

THE 普通傻瓜菲林相機 regularly ( 1x ) MegaPixel ga! so print 8R is enough. I USE CANON S45 and i printed A4, the quality is good . so, i think 3M print A4 will be ok.

[cloudworld]

唔~ argue 都冇乜用 .... 真係好睇個人 ... 呢個link 係kodak express 入面寫0既~ 可以作為參考~

http://www.kodakexpress.com.hk/about_kex/service/image/pic03.gif

[dclkwok]

concur handsome138 and cloudworld's opinion.

[jackngai]

http://www.kodakexpress.com.hk/about_kex/service/image/pic03.gif


不可盡信佢講o既野, 留意佢 4mp 同 3mp o既 pixel, 係 3:2 比例黎架, 同一般真正像素有出入...........2448 x 1632 ??? 邊有咁架, 一般都係 22XX x 17XX