[sund@y]

QV-5700 , ok ma ?

[老叟]

Absolutely OK!! why not??

[samho]

why not OK?
is the price too low that make you afraid??
don't worry, it's not "CHEAP", i think it's "VALUE"

[kevin_chiu]

sand@y,

it's ok, just ok.

[kevin_chiu]

sund@y,

it's ok, just ok.

[jackngai]

功能唔算好多樣化, 但相質好...

[sund@y]

Thx . all...............................

how money "hong" and "water" ???

[kevin_chiu]

I bought one 1 month ago at Wing Shing

$3980 + 128 digifilm CF

講真, resolution 差左少少, 高G3 (只係4M)好少好少.. -_-"

水貨G3都係4k頭, 但多左flip LCD, hot shoe, larger zoom range, Charger, lithim battery.

比我揀多次我情願買水G3. 你自己考慮啦.

[HWC]

Of course QV5700 is a good DC, it is better than many same class DC. But many people do not like Casio only.

It produces a good image. It uses Sony HAD CCD (Very good CCD). It also uses Canon G2 lens (very good lens). Also, the electronic parts of Casio is very famous as Casio is nearly the "Old Brother" in DC field.

For this price, QV5700 is a good choice.

[zteven]

slow focusing

[kevin_chiu]

zteven,

not really.

faster than G3, should be similar as G2.
much faster than 4500, 4300.

btw it has focus asists lamp so it can focus in complete darkness.
5400 has NO focus assits lamp! nikon's great JOKE!

[lowres]

《選擇月刊》最高分(不過係對上一部)的DC，因為《選擇》不計外型分！嘻嘻！

[HWC]

The main disadvantage of QV5700 -- it cannot focus in a dark place even it has AF light. It is the reason why I sold it out. But it is better than Nikon as Nikon has no AF light.

For the focus speed, it is a little bit slower than G3.