[pongyee]

<<不要對曾鈺成存有幻想>>

一直以來，曾鈺成透過其「高明」的言行，例如叫蔣麗芸少講廢話，又以不批准「世界末日」等諧趣手段得到開明建制派稱號。然而，開明建制派的光環，被一段WhatsApp對話粉碎了。

曾鈺成曾公開承諾做主席後不投票、不參加民建聯黨團活動以及不發表政見。可是，「絕密WhatsApp對話」當中，我們可清楚看到他有份參與建制派的行動部署，提示建制派發言及留力策略。什麼「留力仍是首要」、「一定要迫大舊先講」，我們一一看在眼內。暗地裡參與民建聯的策略討論，還算「不參加民建聯黨團活動」嗎？還可確保自己沒有利益衝突嗎？

其實，稍為心水清或記憶力良好的人，都應該記得曾鈺成曾經幾年前的拉布戰時，當召集議員歸位的鐘聲響起後那兩句「返嚟就郁」，和交給黃宜弘的兩張紙條。復會後，黃宜弘隨即向曾鈺成要求終止辯論，曾鈺成便引用議事規則92條剪布。事後他亦承認早已得知黃宜弘有意提出終止辯論。究竟當時他是否有份部署建制派行動？大家心中有數。

連同多番表明支持假普選方案的取態，曾鈺成已經違背「三不」的「不參加民建聯黨團活動」及「不發表政見」。「做主席後不投票」這項承諾，還值得大家相信嗎？
老實說，曾鈺成不中立，沒有什麼好驚奇。建制派為中共的「舉手機器」，人所共知。他們的責任就是通過中共想通過的議案，實現中共控制香港全局的野心。曾鈺成身為建制派的大人物，亦為中共掌控香港政局的得益者，要其不偏不倚，豈不是與虎謀皮？

只是，根據建制派的劇本，有人要好像「Treegun」般「派膠」轉移視線，有人要像「亡國興」般裝兇作勢，自然有人要故作中立，搏取民主派和中間派信任，適當時於背後「過佢地一戙」。被已故填詞人林振強譏為「人頭鼠」的曾鈺成，擁有靈活而鬼祟的「鼠性」，自然是適合人選。更何況，他懂得如米奇老鼠般賣弄親和力，叫一些民主支持者對他存有好感。幸好，這次「絕密WhatsApp對話事件」，狠狠地撕破其假面具，將其狡黠的政客真面目曝露於人前。明明違背對大眾的諾言，偏要在人前卻扮中立扮持平，終淪為過街老鼠。

各位民主支持者，我們對民主派議員尚且要有監察的態度，何況建制派？他們是站在中共一方的人，請不要對曾鈺成等任何一個建制派議員存有幻想。

https://hk.news.yahoo.com/-075826407.html

[pongyee]

真係笑死，不肻想知到底邊類人會對豬肉成有幻想？

[d10c]

>>> 對曾鈺成存有幻想？


我 蟲 來 對 減肥敗 母 患 上 過



你 有 ？


咁 我 就 恭 投 喜 2 你 地


結 分 終 於 俠 發 化 :


Supreme Court Legalizes Gay Marriage Nationwide

Posted: 06/26/2015 10:02 am EDT Updated: 5 hours ago

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on Friday that it is legal for all Americans, no matter their gender or sexual orientation, to marry the people they love.

The decision is a historic victory for gay rights activists who have fought for years in the lower courts. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia already recognize marriage equality. The remaining 13 states ban these unions, even as public support has reached record levels nationwide.

The justices found that, under the 14th Amendment, states must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognize same-sex unions that have been legally performed in other states. Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor. In a rare move, the four dissenting justices each wrote an opinion.

The lead plaintiff in Obergefell v. Hodges is Ohio resident Jim Obergefell, who wanted to be listed as the surviving spouse on his husband's death certificate. In 2013, Obergefell married his partner of two decades, John Arthur, who suffered from ALS. Arthur passed away in October of that year, three months after the couple filed their lawsuit.

Obergefell was joined by several dozen other gay plaintiffs from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee who were fighting to be able to marry and to have their marriage recognized in every state in the country.

In the majority opinion, the justices outlined several reasons same-sex marriage should be allowed. They wrote that the right to marriage is an inherent aspect of individual autonomy, since "decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can make." They also said gay Americans have a right to "intimate association" beyond merely freedom from laws that ban homosexuality.





班 發 棺 個 樣 都 GAY GAY 地

[kingkonghk]

凸手爆陰毒

驚真肉x下介腸佢個位

[pongyee]

呢個係其中一個合理嘅推論。