[S50]

Tamron AF28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 Macro [IF] XR 呢個鏡好唔好呀?
去旅行帶幾個鏡頭... 好唔方便. 想要一支走天涯.. 唔洗換.

同埋tamron 有支 28-300mm 掂唔掂呀?

[marcoho]

28-200 xr 呢支好野來架~
不過如果有支28-300 就更好啦..係咪?
tamron 呢兩支鏡都做得幾好,又輕,質素又唔錯

[ninekit]

i don't have hand-on experience with these two lens, but most of my friends who bought the original Tamron 28-200 and its XR variants told me they regret to have bought them wor. Among them, one went over to Tokina ATX, one went over to Canon fixed focal length and L lens, one get stucked with the 28-300 and added a 20mm fixed focal length. And lastly, another said he should have bought the SP 24-135mm instead.
So, no happy users I really know using these extreme zoom lens. But undoubtedly, they are good for travel light, just have to be prepared for the quality compromise lor.

[samho]

講究質素與輕便，向來都是難以兼得

試下 EF 35-350 加支 20-25 zoom, 我識一個攝影記者係咁用

[Velsper]

35-350 係咪好貴?~

[S50]

我都知 L 鏡好, 但我呢D 新仔, 構圖技巧, 技術都未到家, 用咁鬼貴鏡真是有點浪費. 講質數.當然係L鏡, 但要買番支, 真係要儲下錢... 同埋佢地都好重呀, 真係要做GYM 先得.

我啱啱揾倒TARMON 28-200 的REVIEW 呀.. 好似幾掂. 又平.

http://www.photosharp.com.tw/cameratest/tamron28-200macro.htm

[ninekit]

Yes, this latest generation could improved a lot. personally i will still suggest SP 24-135mm as travel lens. 24mm is true wide angle for landscape. and I believe Tamron label it 'SP' for some real reasons.

In the same boat la, I cannot afford L lens too. :)

35-350 is L lens, not only expensive, and very heavy tim ar.

[S50]

How much is the SP 24-135mm AR?

[ninekit]

sorry about i don't have any price information, you may like to ask ask the shops or friends here, if i didn't remember wrongly, its around HKD 2,xxx

type in "tamron sp 24-135" in www.google.co.jp and specify you want to search websites in Japan only, you should be able to find a couple photo sites which pictures are taken with the lens. in my opinion, its not bad at all.

good luck.

[ZeissIkon]

邊o度有得賣?幾銀?

[smartlam]

呢支鏡確係唔錯,但如果用0係 Minolta 機身上就一定唔好買,因為呢支鏡冇內置摩打,而且 Minolta 機身內置摩打又唔夠力,配合用反應同對焦都好慢。我就唔知用0係其他兩隻牌子相機上又會點效果喇!? 因為始終呢支都係鏡組太多又冇內置摩打。但論價格我買時都係仟零蚊都好抵玩,細心對焦影出黎0既相都唔錯,但影動態0既相我就覺得唔掂啦~

[jackngai]

Tamron AF28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 Macro [IF] XR 我用過, 我覺得夠sharp, 顏色實淨, 有Marco mode, 我覺 得好好用, 上一份工因為成日要出門, 後尾轉左工我先讓左俾朋友....

Tokina ATX 係得支 24-200 唶, 呢支好在 wide d, 但在 200mm 時, 一定唔夠Tamron 28-200 XR 咁sharp, 我兩支都試過, 所以好肯定........而且最近對焦距離 係 80cm, 比 tamron 28-200 XR (49cm) 差得遠........


Tamron AF28-200mm f/3.8-5.6 Macro [IF] XR - 永成行貨 1780 五年保養
Tamron AF28-300mm f/3.8-5.6 Macro [IF] XR - 永成行貨 2780 五年保養
Tokina ATX 24-200mm f/3.5-5.6 - 2150

SP24-135 冇意見.........得 135mm , 唔同range, 冇得比較.......
如果要買定焦鏡, 當初根本唔應該買 28-200, .......就算過萬元一支zoom 鏡皇, 質數都比唔上一支二千幾蚊o既定焦..

[Soul-Neul]

呢支野只要你唔介意下下stop down先有好既resolution就無問題

因為夠細支, for travel photography幾方便

[呀超]

本人在一次攝影活聽到兩位老人家的對話。意思大約是後生果陣有氣有力，
更係用定焦鏡啦，而家老喇冇辦法，好彩有變焦鏡，呢枝 28-200mm冇得頂，變焦倍率大，一鏡走天涯，最適合我o地。

[ninekit]

a little to add or correct, one of my friend using the Tamron 28-200, switched to Tokina ATX Pro 28-70 (or ~ 80, can't remember extractly), F2.8, instead of the even more extreme 24-200.

agreed, the former is super-handy, but reasonably thinking, you cannot get the best of the two world, or you may have to pay a lot of premium.

with todays not v. uncommon existances of DSLR users, I will suggest you may like to ask if friends can send you some samples taken with the subjected lens, and then you can tell whether you are OK with or not lor.

Jack hing, do you mind give a hand?