[newmanchan]

影開靜態野....人像....
之前用過下D90....

[peterlam199477]

5D MARK II better than D700

1. 第一優點當然係最大賣點! 35mm的CMOS! 更輕易做出淺景深, 黑角, 焦距也如鏡頭所示, 多少就是多少.
2. 特高像素! 兩千一百萬! 更能拍出細節, 也可以cut相後使用依然有一定的像素.
3. 最強ISO! ISO25600! 雖然好少機會用到, 但3200和6400係可用的ISO, 前提是要知道怎用.
4. 可拍高清影片. 雖然手動對焦可能比較難用, 但有時, 幾會想拍一下影片的.
5. 扎實可信的機身. 比不上1D系列, 但依然值得信賴.
6. "輕巧"的機身. 真得是比Nikon D700和Sony a900輕巧少少.
7. 3吋90萬像素LCD~ 睇相睇片真係好靚.
8. 可選舉Raw, sRaw1, sRaw2, 有效控制記憶卡的容量.
9. 更大的觀景器or3吋LCD LiveView 可輕易使用手動鏡 & 手動對焦.
10. 可顯示電池壽命(分四級)和更準確的電池容量(1%)
11. 可對不同鏡頭使用對焦微調功能, 機身會對個別鏡頭的調整記錄下來.
12. 可使用黑角修正功能, 有時候會不希望出現黑角的.


But Very Expensive

[newmanchan]

5D MK2 既對焦係咪真係咁唔掂?

[David_Man2020]

我會揀 5D MARK II

[wing_kw]

影靜態人像買5d2實無後悔

[st1000]

newmanchan Ching, 你係Canon 討論區問Canon 定 Nikon, 我想大部分Ching都會答5D2,

其實
有好多人用canon影好多靚既人像相
亦有好多人用nikon影好多靚既人像相
亦有好多人用sony影好多靚既人像相
亦有好多人用pentax影好多靚既人像相
亦有好多人用olympus影好多靚既人像相
亦有好多人用乜野機都可以影好多靚既人像相

機係死機, 人係生既
機係硬件, 人係軟件

唔識影既用乜都係唔靚

anyway, 聽人講冇用, 自己試, 上SC試下邊部咁你
可能..最後真係覺得架架都差唔多
到時再係鏡頭, 手感, 操作介面到取捨

[ivanclw]

最緊要果幾樣野:

價錢, 對焦點及反應, iso ,

都係 D700贏

[kiktkit]

影人5D2
作品發表區over 50%女像用5D2,

[Marksman01]

Here is Canon forum, so my advice is on the CMOS/CCD, the critical part of a DSLR - the 5D2 CMOS blown away the D700's

[kiktkit]

會用定焦就5D2

[factotum]

my candid advice

1. In the digital world, you can tune the colors of whatever you like. If you noticed the book "黑麵的人像攝影攻略", he uses Nikon camera. Thus, you can rule out this factor.

2. Nikon body and its lens are more expensive than Canon. You should consider this point as you will buy more lenses.

3. Nikon zoom lens is better than Canon

4. Canon has lots of lenses

5. Canon prime lens is solid rock

7. D700 is faster AF response than 5D Mark II

8. D700 has internal flash

9. 5D Mark II has more pixels. It is good if you crop the photo.

[Obi-Wan]

Good points!

[Marksman01]

Don't think using post processing can change the PQ of CMOS/CCD, otherwise all the digital back for the professional were just a waste of money.

[wing_kw]

事實就係事實

[factotum]

>Don't think using post processing can change the PQ of CMOS/CCD

I think the PQ of CMOS/CCD is to measure the raw image quality but not an evaluation of overall camera image quality or performance. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

I found D700 is ranked higher than 5D Mark II in http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/Camera-rankings. As you know, this site is solely measured the raw image quality.

I found another worth of reading article at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/advanced21/25105551 邁向Canon 5D Mark II (與Nikon D700比較心得)