[ivanivan05]

我自己依家用緊nikon自己那支，其實已經算好sharp~~但我想問各ching Carl Zeiss那支質素是否真的更sharp?差好遠嗎？
但只有MF，會否好難用？應該換Carl Zeiss嗎？
請ching俾D意見～～～

[manpo79]

我覺得兩支鏡都已經非常正,邊支好真係睇你自己喜歡

[ivanivan05]

因為聽聞zeiss那支系超勁sharp~~~極品級~~所以又心思思，但我怕MF較難用～～

[manpo79]

兩支都極品級黎,唔好睇少支nikon 85 1.4
MF 唔會太難用,ZF對焦幾好扭,但當然多一層功夫

[春田花]

如果你只係著眼於支鏡有幾sharp就繼續用Nikon啦，不是一句sharp就可以解釋CZ成像質素，又如果你用緊full frame或菲林機，我才見議你用CZ，不然Nikon 85mm f1.4巳好夠用。

[ivanivan05]

then,what are other features of CZ 85.4 in addition to sharpness?i m using D700......how is it related to CZ quality?thx ching~

[ivanivan05]

no one can give comment ma.?

[fwan67]

what other features do u need ? A lens is to give you sharp image and no distortion.

Don't expect German will do many fancy things like Japanese. They focus on optics only.

[lawrence_clk]

Carl Zeiss 85/1.4 我就未用過，所以唔可以比任何意見；不過 Nikon 85/1.4 就用緊，可以話 Sharp、excellent。我覺得 Nikon 85/1.4 係可以達到攝影師好高要求，一定合你用。

[Mickeyfans0101]

要留意CZ 會變成全手動, 連測光都沒有.
我在花展時CZ COUNTER試鏡, 同問過職員

是個人喜好, 我較愛LEICA