[fannycht]

Yesterday I went to a lens pro shop at Ocean Terminal and planned to buy the 14-24 2.8. The professional sales talked to me that this is more for indoor photos and he said it's a general misconception that people thought it was for taking landscape photos (that is my intention as I am going to Australia shortly). He said 24-70 is good enough. Ultra wide lens is hard to manage. Is this true?

[cy3213]

這也是室内？

[cy3213]

景都有

[Danny Wong]

此乃Nikon鏡皇之一, 个人覺得比24-70mm還要正，但當然用途24-70mm會用多D。如果拍風景再加上FF機オ值得投資。

[cy3213]

一起擁有就VERY GOOD啦！

[薑餅人]

cy3213 師兄放 Ultra-Wide 毒~~ (D90 + 14-24 都幾 Wide)



24-70/2.8 就放個美女上來
睇o黎樓主要大出血了

[cy3213]

我D相有幾毒吖！不過經濟許可，WHY NOT？當投資也好，儲蓄也好！好鏡用得爽，將來拿來賣也價值更高。我支384用了2年，因爲改用328賣出，還可以賺幾百，好鏡頭一定值得買。

[pik825]

D色真係好出.

[薑餅人]

>> 用了2年，還可以賺幾百

師兄好平入?

[cy3213]

六千幾

[B and H]

唯一可以講既係"做人要有獨立思考能力, 不問原因就人講乜照單全收" ^_^

[EMK]

14-24 and 24-70兩支都是絕對好鏡, 24-70 實用性較高, 14-24 遇大場面及宏偉建築物就佔盡優勢, 兩支都不會買錯, 其實買鏡係好講個人用途, 要常用才值得買, 看你喜歡影什麽才投資

[cy3213]

喜歡及能負擔就買最開心，理他人的一套咩！

[EMK]

14-24

[lambertnh]

14-24/2.8 @ 北京

我反而覺得 OUT DOOR 先正