[ma2918]

本人使用d90kit+70-300vr

現時想添置17-55mm2.8f或24-70mm2.8f

唔知買邊支好D

17-55mm2.8f($9xxx)forDX
24-70mm2.8f($13xxx)forDXandFF

兩三年後有機會升上全片幅

想問下成像方面分別大嗎?

請各C-hing俾下意見......thx

[Dmo]

比D作品離睇睇啦

[manpo79]

如果要買鏡皇,點解唔直接上D700?

[ma2918]

各c-hing......本人部d90只買左3-4個月,暫時唔想換住.....

[manpo79]

咁新,放出去仲好價啦
但如果真係唔想換
我唔會買17-55,始終係DX 鏡,放出去唔見2-3千
24-70,要3-4年後先發揮功效
咁我不如買定焦玩住先好過

[hochimo]

"出去唔見2-3千"??
Indeed....
New 24-70: $13400 resell value: $11500 (Difference: $1900)
New 17-55: $9600 resell value: $7800 (Difference:$1800)

And performance is not bad of 17-55 on DX compare to 24-70. Also u may need to buy another wide lens after buying 24-70.

Pls check the below link for 24-70 17-55 28-70 PQ battle
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=248&t=542133

My opinion is DX for DX, but seems u addict to take photo, if u bought 17-55, you'll itchy and miss 24-70 all the time. I would suggest u to buy 24-70 then (I foresee u will upgrade to FF less than 2-3 years hahahaha)

[茶水亞四]

講成像兩支都靚。
不過個人論，17-55mm發色會比24-70mm濃一點。
但變型控制則24-70mm優勝。
至於DX、FX的問題，相信師兄已經了解。

[老叟]

for past,present and future, FX is the big issue!!!!
you just ignore it??? it's your problem only!!!!

[keith.hk]

我之前都有咁簡過

考慮到 真實使用情況後 買左 17-55
因為 24 x1.5 變左 36mm 用得冇咁方便
況且都打算用兩三年, 到時放左佢, 買過枝新既24-70, 到時咪仲開心~