[WING237567]

我用d80既....買邊支好.?

[ksmo7]

I have similar question as yours. I use D80 + Tamron A16 and want to upgrade. Borrowed my friend's 18-200vr1 for test. I like the range and color, but it is not a sharp lens, especially from ~135 - 200mm. A16 is much sharper in general. Another problem with 18-200vr1 I was its aperture. 5.6 at 200mm is not convinent at lower lights. As you may agree, for D80 you cannot push the ISO above 800. So for my use, I decide not to get 18-200vr.
16-85vr is very sharp for the whole range at almost any aperture. From photo samples its colour is nice. Distortion at 16mm is obvious, but is acceptable to me. The only concern over A16 is its aperture: it is not a fast lens.
But if the choice is between 18-200vr1 and 16-85, I will definitely get 16-85.

[eedbt]

我祗有16-85 VR, 冇18-200VR1
16-85 VR
1. VR 2代
2. 16mm 變形少, 24mm 開始無變形
3. 對焦摩打超快, 追小孩子影都得, 有閃配合會更好.
4. 16-85vr 全段 sharp

[ahdog]

i have 16-85 only. I support 16-85.

[veryoldcat]

我冇16-85；但有18-200vr1，冇質素。

[pigpig2000]

我冇16-85 VR,祗有18-200VR1
18-200 VR
1. 一樣係VR 2 代
2. 18mm 影出黎成個酒桶咁
3. 對焦摩打都ok快
4. 同16-85比，全段唔sharp
5. 好處只有一個，方便。 懶人恩物 ^_^

[sunnywstam]

16-85 ( 135 格式 24-127)
成像質數及變形度 都比18-200 好(135 格式 27-300)
一般高倍數 soom 鏡成像質數
前後段麻麻 只有中段可取
但勝在方便 欲稱天涯鏡

16-85 成像質數由頭到尾都好平均

每一支鏡都有好處輿壞處
須要那一支就要看用家自己決定啦！

[alvinr33]

18-200VR質數比不上16-85VR, 但焦段取勝.
18-105VR質數比不上16-85VR, 但焦段及價錢取勝.
16-85VR質數又遠比不上17-55, 但價錢取勝.

所以, 有時要從方便, 質數與價錢三方面衡量, 你看重那一方面才可以.

[snowball]

18-200VR/18-105VR 質數比不上16-85VR, 但焦段取勝??
>> Not exactly agree, both lens missing 16-17.99mm which is very useful!

[alexee]

16-85 the best ^^

[johnxlee]

ditto :)

[ed_ca]

why not 18-200VRII?

[eedbt]

[測試分享]17-55mm VS 16-85mmVR VS 18-200mmOS

[wklouis]

點解會拎支死馬18-200去比呢?!

[uranusc6]

可吾可以compare with Nikkor 18 -200 ?
Thks