[tungch8899]

Any good suggestion on which is a good fisheye and/or wide angle lens for Nikon D300? Thanks.

[王迦南]

還有哪支較這支更 Good ?

[tungch8899]

How much it costs?

[beeboy]

$5000...........................>>>>>>

[tungch8899]

How does it compare with Nikon fisheye 16mm and Tokina AT-X 116 11-16mm f2.8? Which is the best? Thanks.

[braemar721]

Nikon fisheye 16mm for FF
Nikon fisheye 10.5mm for DX
116 not a fisheye

[Zeiss_T]

I hv Tokina 10-17mm fisheye

Work perfect in DX

And Also available in FX ........range in 14mm to 17mm

So fit in FX look much "Fish" than in DX

[kelvinolph]

I also have the Tokina which work perfectly on my D300.

The most important is that I have tried the Nikon, Sigma and Tokina before I make the deal. I found that the Tokina is the most worth-buying since its price is so attractive when compare to the others.

Moreover, both the Nikon and Sigma is not that much better than Tokina optically.

In built quality, Tokina is just like a tank, and in my opinion, it is better than Sigma.

When you compare the price, optical quality and handling, Tokina may not be the best, but it is the most worth-buying fisheye lens.

P.S. Plz forgive my poor English.

[Xplore]

FF 用到 10-17mm?

[ringomov]

Tokina 10-17mm for DX 3千幾 $好低玩。

[tungch8899]

Thanks a lot for Chings' comments.

I am seriously considering Tokina 10-17 but it seems the image is not "fisheye enough", i.e. something between fisheye and wild angle.