[OLD HUI]

D90現有A16, 50.8, 70-300VR+SB600,
A16室內唔用閃光燈好震,加上"F- -"問題,所以想換~
16-85VR $5250, 24-85 F2.8-4 $4150,
2支都有人話好/壞,
24-85在用家心得內,被人講到好超值,
可以玩微距,成像,發色都好好(用家心得內),
16-85有VR,不過光圈最大只有3.5,
3.5同2.8相差遠嗎?
各前輩有什麼高見?或有無其他鏡可選擇?
B005有VC是否好A16好多呢?
先多謝各位幫忙^^

[Zawa]

震仲要換D細光圈鏡...?
買支2.8加VC LA

[nofeel]

看你需要什麼, 你要景深夠淺又要zoom一定係f2.8...
考唔考慮定焦? e.g. 50 1.4 質素一定好, 室內唔怕震, (都震轉會用sony 機身防震 : p)

[marisalwy]

Old Hui,

For DX camera (e.g. D90), Nikon 16 - 85/3.5 - 5.6

For FX camera (e.g. D700), Nikon 24 - 85/2.8 - 4

[michelle071180]

龍仔A16同B05我都用過,B05有VC真係差好遠,日頭收光圈去到F4真係好利有17-55原廠FEEL,手持夜境1/4秒都冇事個VC超勁,而A16都OK但成色同B05比就差小小,而16-80 NIKON 就光圈細今小弟就冇用過但都有好好評價,但之前用過18-105 VR 同樣F3.5,差一級就係差一級冇得比,睇你會唔會成日影夜景如果係就入B05,但SIGMA就黎出17-50 F2.8 OS HSM 但價錢未定如果唔急可以等等,話曬都有防震同超音波摩打

[OLD HUI]

小弟在室內影人多,行商場時影境+人,
所以盡量想用自然光,
還是入支35 F2 / 35.8是否好的選擇?
除了35 F2可以用在FX的分別外,
2支在質素上分別大嗎?

[Xplore]

no need waste money on DX len

Especially 16-85 VR

[snoopybee]

24-85 2.8-4 <----- x 10000000

My friend got this for her D80, damn nice. I also tried it with my D700, very good as well. I got 28-70 already otherwise I would have get this one as well.

[snoopybee]

3.5 Vs 2.8

你無需理會, 因為大家都只係左最短焦距時才出現. 反而你要留意, 最細光圈囉

5.6 Vs 4 <------- this makes a hell lot of a difference.