[kit_chi2001]

我只是一名新手 請各位不要見怪啦..

因網上甚或朋友所說的canon & nikon機成像的分別都不同
想請教一下 分別在哪?
真的是他們所說 : canon 色彩柔和 適合影人像
而nikon 色彩銳利 適合影景嗎....

還是只是拍攝者的技術問題呢? (這是我認為的= =)

我多會用作旅行拍攝的 人和景同樣多影
我先前用的是 Olympus E-520
正在計劃換新機 但由於仍是學生 資金很少呢...
煩惱換canon or nikon 機較好

canon的話只能考慮450D/500D
nikon D3000/D5000

其實想深一層: 450D & D3000 會比E-520優勝嗎?

我是女的, 但用過500D 同樣覺得有點過輕 不好拍
機身質料的確不太好 像玩具
但機不是我的, 所以相的質素也不太清楚

我也知道D90 是非常好, 但實在資金不足 (還得花錢去旅行啦 )
新手也好像用不著太多和複雜的功能 是嗎?

若果買機的話 各位師兄可以給我一些意見嗎?
雖然是很蠢的問題 但希望你們能賜教啦....
希望從你們身上能一點一點的學懂拍攝的技術 很感謝♥♥♥

[sannaso]

E-520你有咩唔滿意?

[kit_chi2001]

不是啦 只是那機是學校借給我的 總要歸還啊
所以計劃買相機 就是這樣
Canon & nikon 的看了很多 也問了朋友 但是人人說的都不同
我都拿不定主意了/_\

其實e-520 也是挺好的 我去南京拍的照也很棒
但是它是超舊款 所以我也想知道入門機種如d3000 會否比它優勝等等的.

[sannaso]

d3000 or d5000 also is good,但有一樣重點你必須要知道,哩兩部機既機身係無摩打,要用自動對焦,就一定要用有摩打既鏡頭,etc...DX鏡/AF-S鏡,canon機出廠時d色係淡少少,但可在相機內調較返

[sannaso]

E-520的cmos是4/3,而D3000/5000 or 450/500d的cmos是aps-c,面積約為4/3的一倍,所以細節位同雜訊控制都會比4/3機好一點

[pierokwong]

There are people said:
canon 色彩柔和 適合影人像
而nikon 色彩銳利 適合影景....

I believe it's not always the case, there are too many factors comes into consideration, e.g. the lens will make a huge difference as well.

I am a Nikon user, check out my link for some sample:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Wagga-Wagga-Australia/Piero-Photography/108224575864599

I think the first thing you wanna do is to company and handle the two camera side-by-side, as the design of the body between N & C is HUGE. You wanna find out which camera fits into your hand better. For me, Nikon is sooooooooooo much better than Canan in terms of handling and long time use. I am a professional photographer, so I am doing like 8 hours shooting continuously all the time.

And then you wanna see what's the brand mostly use between your friend if you believe they happy and willing to exchange lens with you.

Also if you are after good image quality, maybe you wanna buy a good prime lens like 50mm f/1.8 to start with. It will give you much better image quality and faster shutter speed than the kit lens. You will appreciate the beauty of a fast prime lens when you start shooting in low light situation. Trade off is you can't zoom with the 50mm f/1.8, but you can move you own body to "zoom", right? Kit lens quality is not even close to the f/1.8. I think this is under HK$1,000, should be around $800 when I saw that in Feb when I was travel to HK.

Let us know if you wanna know more or unsure about anything.

Cheers,
Piero

[kit_chi2001]

我身邊的朋友會用dslr的實在不多. 但會用的全部都用canon (好像都是450D)
甚至我去外地交流時 幾乎所有老師都是攝影愛好者 但全都在用canon啦
雖然我本來就想買nikon 的 但總會想到canon真的那麼好嗎?

若果這是consideration的話, 我非要買canon不可了= =

[yauth]

唔駛理 妳班老師用咩la, 將來你又會有新一班老師

我都覺得500d 太玩具感

nikon d5000雖是入門機,
但我絕對有信心把拍攝工作做好, d 相一定sharp, 至少機身mon 看到的, ~99%同屋企mon 一樣.

canon, 特別是入門機..
嘔~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[KEI16]

我都覺得nikon既入門機比canon 優勝..
d5000/3000比500d/450優勝

[kit_chi2001]

我才不是要跟隨老師啦= = (都中七畢業了)
只是在想人人都在用canon 它肯定有一些優勝之處吧...?

我也實在不喜歡canon的玩具感 太輕太塑膠了吧!?
的確我也覺得d5000 比500d 好 但請問為何500d 會那麼熱門呢?

至於機身沒摩打的 我都知道啊 也不太介意
不是常常買鏡換鏡的話 影響該不大吧?!

[vincelihofai]

I previously owned a D90 & my gf used a 500D. I think the low light performance (ISO) for 500D is worse than D90. The speed of auto-focus is also slower than D90. Plastic feel is obviously a weak point for Canon entry level DSLR..I traded the 500D after 8 months use..

In my opinion, D5000 shares 90% of the parts of D90. So the quality is very alike. I will vote for Nikon's entry level camera.

[kit_chi2001]

請問一下師兄 canon 500d 拍人像真的比nikon機拍得美嗎?

low light performance (iso) 是我選擇相機的重要條件啦
d3000 的價格實在很便宜 且功能也不俗
但它的comment 總是說到了iso 800 就不能用
聽了還是有點卻步呢

但d5000 又再貴一截....

500d 跟d90 的級數好像是不同的. 大概很難比得上吧
我想. d5000 跟500d 才可以比得來:-)

[SunnyDevil]

妳在nikon 版ask question and at canon ask question have diff 答案la

[kit_chi2001]

這個我當然明白 只是在聽取不同意見 謝謝

[wartercheung]

「還是只是拍攝者的技術問題呢? (這是我認為的= =) 」

你說對了 ,完全是技術問題 .

廣告攝影師全需要銳利的鏡頭 ,他們拍攝的人像不美嗎 ?

銳利的鏡頭還有很多好處......