[mrchan318]

用緊D90 / 15-85mm
想upgrade D300s or 17-55 2.8f, 有必要嗎?
用左1年,發覺開始對焦唔夠快,(唔知關支鏡定部相機事)
有走焦情情況,
得11點真係唔多夠用
自勳白平衡效果又唔多準.
但又認為自已唔係Pro友只係用作旅行及影小朋友,
冇理由D90都唔夠用,有需要upgrade嗎?
各位c hing 請幫幫忙

[Evan_]

D300s 對焦快d, 影移動物成功機會高好多
17-55 出黎既影像質素好好多

影運動試下用3D 追焦, 留意快門速度
去旅行 D90 輕便D

我會買鏡先~

[sannaso]

D3X

[whispermakers]

D300s 對焦快d, 影移動物成功機會高好多
17-55 出黎既影像質素好好多

影運動試下用3D 追焦, 留意快門速度
去旅行 D90 輕便D

我會買鏡先~

=======================================
x2

[manpo79]

兩樣都買晒.就唔需要諗換咩好

[snoopybee]

夠竟係你玩機, 定機玩你, 自己細心衡量同取捨. 睇 spec 當然係 D300 對焦快過 D90. 若然懂得好好掌握手上器材, 一部 DC 仔都可以影到 F1. 就算講緊 D3s/D90 都唔會相差一秒的對焦時間掛. 講緊千份一/百份一/十份一秒的分別時, 其實係講緊你點運用器材多於一切. 當然啦, 你有 budget 而且想搵個藉口換機的話, 呢個都可以係一個好原因來. 細心想想, 就算講緊菲林機年代, 冇 3D 追焦, 點解人家都影到咁多相, 反而依家科技進步左咁多, 自己都影唔到, 而且仲要賴落器材度? 唔係要話樓主, 不過呢個問題係好值得現今 "玩相機" 的人反思.

Oh, 答埋你先, 比我揀, 我會用 upgrade 的 budget 去買支鏡.

[alexchoy26]

買支鏡先! 機快鏡慢都係會慢的! 同一支鏡我分別唔到有幾大差距!
ps: 追焦我用單點多! d80同d300比

[winnwong]

試吓連拍mode後, 滿意否先算.
既然已有 16-85, 再上的鏡梗係24-70, 你想吓如你要追個moving kid, 通常都係遠位置捕佢, 17-55唔夠tele.

另外, 24-70可第日上FX機, 到時實唔會"SIGN", 到你要求高時又會嫌D90 ISO唔夠好, 推高後太多NOISE, 分分鍾跌埋隻腳入D700

[pierokwong]

Agree with Snoopybee x 100

You need to learn how to 懂得好好掌握手上器材

A better lens will make a big difference on you focusing speed. The lens you are using now is too slow.

I guess D300s is a bit faster than D90. If you are after ultimate focusing speed, then you can only go up to D700 or D3s is order to see the real difference. When I am talking about ultimate focusing speed, I am talking about paying job like shooting sport event in a dim lighted stadium.

So if you are preparing to spend that big money for the speed difference, go for 17-55 f/2.8 and you will have a much better image quality plus a big jump in focusing speed.


Also you need to learn how to use 單點 focus. When you use 單點, the focusing speed is hugely improved as well


Just be aware to fall into a trap of chasing the new equipments rather than seeking for ways to improve on your skills. As for your needs mentioned in the opening post, I really don't see your "need" on getting a new body except the "heart on chasing new equipment"

Cheers,
Piero

[salonsip2005]

買鏡LA , 師兄 , D90 已經好勁嫁LA~ 你用個支咁0既變焦梗係唔好LA~

同埋如果你用自動白平衡就唔使玩D90 LA~ 用番D5000D3000仲好~

D90 你用左一年自動不如依家用下手動呀

就算依家比部D3S 你都係一樣嫁喳~

同埋你想要D 相數毛0既提意你買支平靚正 50.8!

同埋APSC 機唔使買支17-55 N LU~ 買其他廠已經OK~

[mrchan318]

就算講緊菲林機年代, 冇 3D 追焦, 點解人家都影到咁多相, 反而依家科技進步左咁多, 自己都影唔到,...............
because i am not high hand law.

[snoopybee]

Then you should focus to improve your skills than to blame on the gears. As said above, 就算依家比部D3S 你都係一樣嫁喳~

[pierokwong]

agree agree

seriously. The gear is just a tool. D90 is a good tool and D3s is a better tool.

Are they gonna make a difference? Yes! Only if you have the skill and the brain to full use the tool.

If you improved your skill, I can tell you I was using a D80 for jobs for years before I feel confidence to say that I need a better camera, and then upgrade to D700 & D3s. But looking back to the old day, D80 gave me really good photos with the 17-55 f/2.8 lens. But the high end body serve as a better tool to improve on my work flow on daily basis. Say one sec faster on each photos, when you think about a photo section with 1200 plus photos, that save me up lots of time.

Bro, there is a big difference on "learning photography" & "playing equipments" ... you know what I mean?

btw, one more suggestion for you, if you wanna learn some real skill, try to stay away from 3D 追焦 and the green AUTO mode. Try to use your brain to think about what you wanna get in the photo rather than let the camera decide on everything.

Cheers,
Piero

[pierokwong]

agree agree

seriously. The gear is just a tool. D90 is a good tool and D3s is a better tool.

Are they gonna make a difference? Yes! Only if you have the skill and the brain to full use the tool.

If you improved your skill, I can tell you I was using a D80 for jobs for years before I feel confidence to say that I need a better camera, and then upgrade to D700 & D3s. But looking back to the old day, D80 gave me really good photos with the 17-55 f/2.8 lens. But the high end body serve as a better tool to improve on my work flow on daily basis. Say one sec faster on each photos, when you think about a photo section with 1200 plus photos, that save me up lots of time.

Bro, there is a big difference on "learning photography" & "playing equipments" ... you know what I mean?

btw, one more suggestion for you, if you wanna learn some real skill, try to stay away from 3D 追焦 and the green AUTO mode. Try to use your brain to think about what you wanna get in the photo rather than let the camera decide on everything.

Cheers,
Piero

[snoopybee]

"我唔係高手", 只係一個比你唔去進步的藉口. 我都唔係什麼高手, 但係我可以好肯定話你知, 你所講的 moving object, 甚至影街上會郁的車, 呢度所有人都唔會話影唔到.

既然你唔係高手, 咁你用住 "低手機" 係最適合不過. 到你技術有所進步先再買機買鏡.

做事係講 "心".