[baldric168]

When I bought the D300s, I got the 18-105 as well.
Now I am thinking of getting 18-200 VR II, Please advise it is worth it or not

[kelvinolph]

Will you consider 70-300VR?

[gwu1]

18-200 just for convenience, not for the best optical quality.

[qkiuhk]

我用D90，有興趣買70-300 VR，睇過CHING POST相勁利勁靚，是否真係用得過?但我係女仔會唔會覺得太重呢?

[baldric168]

Thanks everyone's input. So regarding the optical quality, 18-105 is better than 18-200?

What about 70-300?

I am looking for a lens that I can use it in any condition.

[winnwong]

睇過CHING POST相勁利勁靚，是否真係用得過?================咁樣問法係咪有語病? 睇怕冇人識答你,
唯一可以答你的就係7038唔算太重, 比起小黑六, 80-400, 或sigma的50-500mm.

[baldric168]

So is it 70-300 VR worth getting?

[SCforever]

No regret with 738VR (Daylight)

PQ must better then 18-105,55-200,18-200,

[SCforever]

D90 - VR 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6G (140mm,f13,1/40,iso 200)

[SCforever]

室內都無問題,(加支燈就咩鏡都利啦!!)
樓主不如考慮埋買多支外閃!! ^^