[sarinaauyeung]

有何分別? 請指教.
Nikon AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8D
Nikon AF-S 17-55mm f/2.8G DX IF-ED

[feet]

DX format and FX format lens

[sarinaauyeung]

Sorry 我唔明, 如果用 D60, D70, D80, D200, 可以嗎?
效果及控制上有何分別?

[lambertnh]

17-35 原本是一支 FX 的 Ultra Wide Zoom，用在 DX Body 上就成了 Wide Zoom。

[fwan67]

read my comment on 17-35mm comment. I've been struggle for a long time on it. Basically, old lens colour is more natural then new lens, especially DX.

I've do some research to those people who know nothing about photo and many of them like the outcome of 17-35mm.

Besides, you can see FX will be the ultimate standard. I've read some document and it mentioned that using 17-55mm on FX film will either u can't make use of FX pixel or with black corner there.

This is what I've compare for few months and finally decide 17-35mm lens.

[zust]

>如果用 D60, D70, D80, D200, 可以嗎?

如果用呢類 DX 格式機身的話, 兩支鏡頭都用到的. 不過如果你第時諗住買部 FX 格式相機, 用17-55 f/2.8 就用唔盡個片幅, 即係要 crop 左中間果忽來用 (用相機既 DX mode 會自動幫你做左), 如果唔係四邊就會有黑角.

>效果及控制上有何分別?

如果用於 DX 機身, 理論上兩支鏡在 17-35mm 焦距時既效果同透視控制係一樣的. 不過當然 17-55mm f/2.8 可以 zoom 遠 D.

我估計 17-35mm 在廣角時會少 D 暗角, 因為佢本身設計比 FX 格式用, 用於 DX 格式上, 有暗角都已經 crop 左了.

[sarinaauyeung]

Dear all,

Thanks for all your comments, I still need some time to digest.

Regards, Sarina

[isofisherman]

17-55 f/2.8 外號 DX鏡皇,根本沒預你用系FX機,
同樣 17-35 f/2.8用系DX機,表面上好似由17-35焦距變成 25.5-52.5,
而實際上景深的深淺已經同用系FX機上有好大分別.
以我自已情況,支17-35 f/2.8由菲林機用到 DX機,總系覺得有D問題,基於見識有限,說不出所以然,後來買入17-55 f/2.8 用於DX機上,感覺非常到位和匹配.
兩支鏡須然焦距相若,但內里設計根本用於不同機種,不應同場比較.
小弟愚見,請各位多多指教.