上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
wallacefong
註冊: 2007-03-17
上載我的肖像
|
棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 6 日 |
|
|
不久之前,大家依然飛身買入D300,轉眼間,二手Market 新束束的D300比比皆是。到底人總是貪新忘舊, 還是 700/D3 真的那麼好?
有冇剛剛放左300嘅師兄可以分享吓?
|
|
|
|
 |
王迦南
註冊: 2007-06-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 6 日 |
|
|
聞說A900都係兩皮多些,等著瞧吧!若是真的,D700也會狂瀉哩!
|
|
|
|
 |
ckalbert
註冊: 2008-03-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 7 日 |
|
|
如果我有 D300 就唔會咁快放,DX 機始終仍有不少優點!
|
|
|
|
 |
RRR789
註冊: 2008-08-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 7 日 |
|
|
DX 有什麽優點可說明一下嗎? THX
|
|
|
|
 |
hanny
註冊: 2006-02-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 7 日 |
|
|
aps-c dx
1>lease dark conner
2> more far long distance shooting
|
|
|
|
 |
老叟
註冊: 2003-04-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 7 日 |
|
|
仲有平好多呢
|
|
|
|
 |
goldfish0606
註冊: 2003-12-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 7 日 |
|
|
影人像 , 影風景 , 影夜景D700 / D3好
影微距 , 景雀仔既D300好..... (其實係冇錢買巨炮 & 冇車)
|
|
|
|
 |
wallacefong
註冊: 2007-03-17
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 7 日 |
|
|
Lesser dark corner is simply because DX lens does not need to reach the edge of the lens and that's also why its cheaper and surely DX and FF has their own advantages.
But if you have already got a D300 on hand, what makes you switch to another one and change your mind if you belive D300 is such a good machine originally?
|
|
|
|
 |
beeboy
註冊: 2006-04-02
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 7 日 |
|
|
尤於D3 and D700 太貴,所以現在都好多人用D300 and D80
|
|
|
|
 |
wallacefong
註冊: 2007-03-17
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 7 日 |
|
|
If more people use 300 or 80, why there's still so much stock & supply of 300 in the 2nd hand market?
|
|
|
|
 |
barracudar3
註冊: 2008-07-13
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 8 日 |
|
|
FURTHER TECHNICAL ELABORATION
"lease dark conner"???
I think this guy was trying to refer to the fact of less vignetting in the APS-C System. Since the shape of camera sensors in DSLR are all rectangular in comparison of the circular shape of the lens barrel, lights collected at the centre of sensors are inevitably more than at the edge. Due to the smaller sized sensors adopted in the APS-C System, these sensors are therefore less vulnerable to vignetting than those Full-Format sensors because the distance from the centre to the edge are shorter.
"more far long distance shooting"???
Again, I think this guy was trying to refer to the phenomenon of Crop Factor in the APS-C System. People are always refering to the 1.5x
multiplier in the Nikon APS-C System. It is because the APS-C sensors only capture the centre portion of the information projected by the traditional 35mm lens resulting "cropped field of view". The multiplier equals to the diagonal of 35mm film (i.e., 43.3mm) divided by the diagonal of the APS-C Sensors. For example, a traditional 200mm lens used on APS-C Sensor camera will not make it into a 300mm lens (200mm X 1.5). It is just the information at the rectangular edge of the APS-C sensors have been cropped out and makes the 200mm lens has 300mm lens field of view. The image would not be "pulled" closer in the APS-C System than in the Full-Format case. That is, the telescopic ability of a 200mm lens will not be amplified by 1.5x on the APS-C System and the depth of view will neither be changed. It is just the change in the field of view in the APS-C System that makes the difference.
|
|
|
|
 |
B and H
註冊: 2003-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 8 日 |
|
|
First point, not understand?
Second point, not agreed. Pixel resolution is not the same. Just like D700, when used as DX film, it's only 600M, not like D300 as 12M. Don't say increase the resolution of FF camera to increase DX resolution. To compare, it should use the same resolution to compare. Otherwise, advantage of wide angle of FF can also be compsenated by 後期制作.
|
|
|
|
 |
barracudar3
註冊: 2008-07-13
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 8 日 |
|
|
"First point, not understand?"
Technical issue is never easy to understand but keep trying!
"Second point, not agreed. Pixel resolution is not the same. Just like D700, when used as DX film, it's only 600M, not like D300 as 12M. Don't say increase the resolution of FF camera to increase DX resolution. To compare, it should use the same resolution to compare. Otherwise, advantage of wide angle of FF can also be compsenated by 後期制作"
Nothing was mentioned about the camera resolution above. No body mention anything about the "increase of resolution of FF camera to increase DX resolution"??? In fact, if it is already a "FF camera", how the hack does it become a "DX" by "increasing the resolution"??? Why such is needed to downsize from FF to DX while to "increase the resolution"??? The compability of DX format on D700 is to allow the application of Nikkor DX lens on FX DSLR. As I have elaborated above, only the centre portion of the Full-Format sensor receive image information if DX lens are used due to the Crop Factor in APS-C System, the "left-out" portion of the Full-Format sensor that are not receiving the image information explains why the resolution of D700 lowered from 12M to 7M when DX format is used. It is simply because the "left-out" pixels are not using! It is not fair to directly compare APS-C sized sensors to Full-Format sensors since the size of each pixel on FF sensors are definitely larger than those of APS-C sized if the resolution of both sensors are the same. The "wide angle of FF" is the result of the multiplier effect (1.5x) of the field of view on APS-C System. Since the field of view is multiplied, a wide angle 35mm lens would not have the same field of view as in the Full-Format.
|
|
|
|
 |
pongyee
註冊: 2006-03-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 8 日 |
|
|
>> lease dark conner...
Only when u r using FX lenses on DX bodies.
|
|
|
|
 |
ckalbert
註冊: 2008-03-09
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 棄 D300, 入 700? Post time: 9 月 8 日 |
|
|
不知師兄買機錢由那裡來,我就要靠工作賺回來的,絕不會因有新型號出便要換機!
|
|
|
|
 |
|