[cheungsuet]

尋日有個朋友用E-P2, 覺得個Art filter好好玩, 因我平時只用開DC仔, 朋友建議買部新出但膠感的E-PL1, 因價錢較低, 啱我這個初哥, 唔會咁肉赤!

在此想問各位兩個型號功能上是否完全一樣(除了E-P2冇內置閃光燈), 兩部機影相質素亦是否一樣, 希望大家俾吓意見! 謝謝!

[ACanonGuy]

They are both good cameras and share many of the same technology. My view is:

影相質素 - similar
機質素 - E-P2 has a more solid build and many like the retrospective look more than E-PL1 too
功能 operations - E-P2 behaves like a DSLR camera where you can access settings easier than E-PL1.
影相功能 - very similar other than E-P2 has a bit more advantage for heavy user such as higher shutter speed etc

Whether these differences justify the cost different is subjective.

Also I have heard so many times that photographers like E-P(1, 2, L1) because of the cool art filters. I never use art filter myself because I know I can always apply different ones in post processing instead of at picture taking time. If Art Filter is the motivation, invest in good post processing software such as Lightroom or Photoshop.