[henry88]

Canon 300D user, 覺得支kit鏡唔多掂. 現有約一萬元鬆動,請問應如何選擇?

1. EF17-40 f/4.0 L + EF70-200 f/4.0 L 約一萬零七百

or

2. EF70-200 f/2.8 L 約九千四百

[haircutter]

My suggestion is no.1

[VF4]

I will also choose 1, coz more range to play

[hondav]

Dear all DC fans:

Anyone can give me some comments against the above two lens' image good or not???Are there got very big difference???

Sincerely^.^

Billy CHUNG

[darrens]

I will suggest you buy 小白 IS+小小白+24-70 f2.8L+16-35 f2.8L組成兵團
連D professional photographer也怕怕

[dc2gohk]

『唯美館』模特兒 *服務
閭下是否在影相或拍廣告時需要模特兒,本公司可以幫到你,『唯美館』幫到你。全新一站式服務,只耍拎起電話落call,到拍攝完成,只需打電話6103-9966 或電郵dc2gohk@yahoo.com

[waikin3]

buy 16-35L + 28-70L + 70-200IS

超強~

如果你2個choice就70-200IS la....use 18-55,70-200IS sin...wait u hv $$$ then buy other lens..

[jameslai729]

最主要自己用途,是什麼?先好決定買什麼鏡,
你用300D機,本身300d不是一部好高速的相機,
反而人像方面比較好,同生活相

[ronald_86]

I am 300D user too.
I am using the kit lens and 70-200 f/2.8L now. I think it is better to buy the two len at the same time. When you can save some money, then consider the 17-40 f/4L.

[bean290]

I'm a 20D user with 17-40F4 and 70-200 F4, price of course is the main reason for not getting the 70-200 F2.8 IS, but I found the weight is also important to consider.
However, this combination will miss the 40-70 range which s the most common use for me.
How about the 24-105 L IS ? $less than 10000 wor.

[Canasony]

佢話覺得 kit 唔多掂, 但係已經有, 還算可以填補中間果段
but,
其實kit 鏡的成像並非好唔掂 (我都用20D + kit)
雖然我有副廠鏡如 17-35/2.8-4 及 28-75/2.8,
但我亦有小白及DO, 以樓主的需要(佢冇長焦段)
我覺得 kit + DO 係暫時最好, 而成本不高的組合 (兼有IS)
(我亦以 DO 作為我KIT以外,第二枝鏡)

如果有必要大光圈,&唔滿意 DO 的質素, 推薦小白or 小小白,

17-40 可買可不買啦..
17-40用在 APS-C 上, 除左顏色對比的少少提升外,
並唔見得比 kit 好得好多啫...

[waisin4000]

其實支kit鏡十分好用，十分銳利。
現在我用30d也多數是用kit鏡和小小白。
雖然17-40L質素較好，但不方便。

[winsiilent]

Removed by DCFever.com Admin 3/7/2006

[leungzoe]

[rickwok]

EF70-200 f/4.0 L 和 EF70-200 f/2.8 L 拍出來的照片我真的看不出有任何大分別。

分別是：
1) F4.0平一半
2) F2.8光圈大一級
3) F4.0輕好多
4) F2.8你會得到更大的虛榮感

17-40/F4比kit lens靚幾多？有無靚8倍咁多？但價錢就貴8倍。