[lamsman]

之前部Casio R41壞了，想買番部相機用，唔知買邊部好ｄ，可否俾ｄ意見？　Budget around $3K

[Banon]

Panasonic LX1<----勁多noise

Fujifilm F11 <----勁滑,超少noise

[nicwong]

totally 2 different cameras.... =.=

[心心心]

我去APM試過canon ixus800得LCD 靚過750少少之外及ISO有800之外
但 IXUS750的ISO400都好足夠, 由其是它的CCD1/1.8好過CCD1/2.5
我真試多位朋友不同DC機及 IXUS750 ,IXUS750效果真的最好,晒出的相好靚D 朋友建議買IXUS750
所以我在3月18日在荷里活廣場中原展銷買左IXUS750

[Banon]

係呀!

揀 IXUS 750都唔好揀Panasonic LX1.

F11 高ISO正過 IXUS　750.

[icekinhk]

如果我冇理解錯d 數字, LX1既 iso 80 連 F11既 iso 800都不如！
只係比iso 1600好少少, LX1 既noise control 真係好唔掂。
http://www.dcview.com.tw/article/newreadarticle.asp?id=4177
http://www.dcview.com.tw/article/newreadarticle.asp?id=4142

[tyuen]

I bought an LX1 last year after reading lots of negative comments on noise. (I was tempted to get a Fuji F11 at that time). Well, the noise reduction of LX1 is really poor. For those who want to shoot high ISO in JPG, LX1 is not a good choice.

However, I will not write it off easily. It provides a very good starting point for processing. The small Leica lens is excellent, mega OIS, and RAW. To cope with noise, I will use:
- RAW;
- low ISO;
- slow shutter speed (or + flash)
- Neat Image (better control of noise vs details loss)
- sometimes flash (actually a small slave flash)
- sometimes mini tripod
LX1 is not perfect while it involves some more work and memory. But it's a good camera.

Your path may be different and I will respect all your choice.

[心心心]

但F11 用DX咭貴
IXUS　750用SD咭

[latvia]

其實現在XD 都是450左右1GB, 卡不是問題.
ixus 750 及 f11 都是好機, 我二部都用過. 看你自己喜歡那一款買吧. 各有各好的, F11的快門快, 不易手震, 你影夜景多的話, 可以買F11.
如果是影日相, 買ixus 750, 佢D色會好一點.

[latvia]

Panasonic 的機我不建議買, noise處理不好, 影人面用1:1看會化的, 頭髮都會化.
其光學防震都不會有太大用處, 不及F11的 nature night mode.

[yinbbq]

我最近買左f11.覺得iso800都唔係預期中咁好...在室內影相..在同一光度下.唔開閃光燈,.用朋友的fx8影iso200.雜訊都係同f11 iso800比差唔多.f11還比較易手震.
如果在室外日光充足情況.fx8 iso80..同f11iso80我試過..在電腦放大睇..真係差唔多的.''絶對不易分別出''..LX1我相信都會好過fx8.
但係影夜影.真係f11比較好的..
想睇相的可以add我icq.

[icekinhk]

LX1 noise control 差過 fx8 的, 而panasonic 整體都做得唔好

[tyuen]

>>LX1 noise control 差過 fx8 的, 而panasonic 整體都做得唔好

Panasonic noise reduction is really bad. IF I shoot JPEG, I will turn off the noise reduction.

But if I need to choose a compact digital camera again, LX1 is still on my top of the list.

[Banon]

一枝獨秀<------LX1 D noise


by www.dpreview.com

[tyuen]

Thanks Banon. I've read the review before.

Here's the extract of dpreview conclusion:

Quote: "Now I'm going to qualify this slightly; at ISO 80 and 100 the results are slightly noisier than most 6 and 7MP cameras, but they also show a lot more detail and look a lot sharper, so this is probably more a reflection of Panasonic's approach to noise reduction than a serious problem with the chip. You can tease some amazing results from the LX1 at low ISOs if you're prepared to do some work - specifically shooting in raw mode and tweaking the parameters in Adobe Camera Raw (forget the supplied software - it's worse than useless). At ISO 200 and 400 noise is a serious issue, and you certainly won't want to print very large, but again the inherent quality of the lens means there's plenty of detail, and if you're prepared to do some work yourself (either using noise reduction software or shooting raw), the results are just the right side of acceptable. " End quote