[landexpert]

Canon 70-200 F2.8 L (Non IS) Vs Canon 70-200 F4 L (IS)


Canon 70-200 F2.8 L (Non IS) Vs 70-200 F4 (IS)

Recently, so many brother disposed their 70-200 F2.8 L (Non IS) lens and switch to IS replacement (either 70-200 F2.8 L IS or 70-200 F4 IS).

This refected the image quality produced by IS lens is better than Non-IS lens or IS l;ens is just more fasjionable than Non-IS lens.

In view of the image produced by IS lens, the quality is just slightly inferior than that produced by Non IS lens, so it is worth to switch to IS version even the greatest exposure value is F4.0.

Any C Hings or experts or brothers have any comment or experience ? Thank you.

[JSmith]

同一級數鏡頭，當然有IS總好過冇，考慮都唔係影像質素問題
正所謂各有所好，有人有錢換IS鏡，又有人可以平價入返支L鏡，冇所謂啦

[yung2]

兩支鏡價錢同質素都差唔多，
但論方便拎出街用就當然係70-200 F4 L (IS)，
70-200 F2.8 L 大Ｄ光圈亦有佢拍攝上o既好處，
要買邊支就要睇閣嚇介唔介意拎Ｄ笨重o既攝影器材出街lu~