[SHWong]

請問 Nikon 17-55 F2.8 好唔好用,約$9600.值不值
我想用來景人像,風景
謝謝各位

[Skywalker.]

唔值.... 我覺得相既品質唔會提升好多 (相比 18-70 DX f3.5-5.6)

[stephen0830]

性價比低 (始終太貴)，但又找不到比它更好、更方便之原廠變焦鏡(相對 dslr)，成像銳利，焦距實用，造工不凡！太光圈室內、陰暗處或控制影深相當方便！買了它差不多一年，沒後悔，但到現在，仍覺得此鏡太貴！

[kayue627]

why not think about Sigma 18-50mm f2.8, only $3xxx

[王迦南]

值唔值真係因人而異。

F50貴Corolla超過100倍，速度點都快唔到100倍。值唔值？當然有人認為唔值，但亦有人搶購哩！唔係有錢就買得到添呀！

[flyingfish]

plus: sharp, fast, versatile, reliable(built lke a tank)
minus: heavy, bulky, expensive
but I love it!

[beagle]

Tokina 支新鏡16-50mm F2.8, 四千幾平一半, 質數點睇???

[misakiwai]

Very sharp image, even to f2.8 Metal body, professional feeling
Fast focusing time,but heavy,no repentant .I like it.

[tank]

太貴了

[smallname]

貴但找不到比它好

[@高秋@]

NIKON 28-70 2.8又點睇呢？

[yinbb]

http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=394700&extra=page%3D1

look above link
17-55 is not worth

[D3Xs]

i will buy.