[Freaky]

以下兩幅照片分別利用Canon 300D + Tamron AF18-200 及 Panasonic DMC FX-7 影出來，但是無論顏色的飽和度及光亮度均 Canon 300D 都不及 FX-7，點解? 係唔係 300D 啲 setting 有問題，抑或Tamron 支鏡嘅問題? 請指教！

Canon 300D + Tamron AF18-200

[url][http://images3.fotop.net/albums3/victorlee/20050516/P1010742.jpg][/url]

Panasonic DMC FX-7

[url][http://images3.fotop.net/albums3/victorlee/20050516/IMG_1682.jpg][/url]

[kaawai]

唔係呀！

明顯 300D 果張 睇起黎 靚D。

不過有時 映一般 題材，傻瓜 DC 會靚過 DSLR。

但DSLR做到既野，傻瓜DC永遠做唔到。

我自己有個經驗，我有次用傻瓜機，幫公司映活動
但公司已經請左專人去映，但事後，好多人話我映得靚過個映相佬。（但我覺得明顯 佢映果D靚D）
如果有機會做攝影師，都會面對呢個問題。

[tam_dominic]

There is no doubt your FX-7 can produce good image from its Leica lens.

From your 2 photos , I guess :
Your FX-7 may have set color parameter to 'vivid'
Your 300D may have set the color saturation to '0' or '-1'

You may set 300D color saturation to '+2' then compare with FX-7

Happy shooting !

[Rick Chan]

I think the right links of pic. are exchanged.
Anyway, difference time to take photo will have difference saturation.
Do you remember the weather of day is cloudy or sunny when you press the shutter?

[Freaky]

Ricky,

Yes, the links should be in reverse orders. Both photos were taken last Monday almost at the same time afternoon ('coz I want to compare the photos using these two DC) and the weather was then quite sunny (at least the color of the water is much more blue than it appears in the 300D photo).

Dominic,
I know FX-7 uses Leica lens, but I don't expect the difference in colors is so great between a Tamron lens and a leica lens. The color produced by 300D seems to maintain the necessary details but the colors are so dull ... BTW, I use the default settings in both 300D and FX-7.

Kaawai,
As far as the details are concerned, I agree that the 300D photo is better but in terms of color saturation and brightness, well .... it's a bit disappointing.

[tam_dominic]

You'll like the 300D if you set :
1. color saturation to highest
2. Contrast to highest
3. sharpness to highest.

Happy shooting !

[Rick Chan]

I have took photo on last Monday in Museum of Coastal Defence. The day is sometime cloudy and suddenly sunny. It is more saturation when sunny. I think it is better to manual control the WB of DSLR on that day. And I have heard that DSLR are set a little bit under for the normal exposure to get a more range for computer editing. Do you think/heard so?

[sasasasa]

Freaky:兩張相雖在中午拍攝,但時間相差起碼幾分鐘,當天陽光普照,相信非萬里無雲,,問題在於雲量,直接影響陸地暗位多少,不同時間雲量有差別,所以拍攝出來的照片,很難作出比較.

[dogu]

300D好多情況偏色, 應該唔係Tamron的問題
不過FX-7的照片的海水也過份藍色, 可能FX-7內埋自己enhance左

300D顏色的飽和度 機身setting 同支鏡本身都有關係, 18-200 係旅行鏡, 飽和度係麻麻的

光亮度係因為300D既測光麻麻, 影完要自己睇下histogram.....

--
zion

http://www.fotop.net/zion

[matthew_ykf]

　我覺得兩張相測光時取的光暗位己不盡相同，其實如果同一部相機在同一個位置影同一個景，但如果光線有所改變，顏色亦會有分別．
　就算整張照片現場的光照恆定沒有改變，但如果你的中心測光位置分別向景中的最光位及最暗位進行測光及分別拍照，得出的照片在色彩濃度或色溫上都可不盡相同（當色溫固定在日光時）．