[yoyo726]

各位C兄本人用500D 都系影人多...配以上2支鏡....那支會較好...價錢差好遠..質量有CHING話135比70-200好小小.....有冇C兄2支鏡都有....POST相上來比較OR比小小意見在下好嗎...thanks

[talestar]

睇下你影咩
135 質量如果係指PQ 就好過小白好多 散景奶好多 光圈F2 可用景深極淺
但500D 就唔recommend 要影人像全身.....要好遠
其實2者定位唔算太一樣
zoom 鏡 vs 定焦 重量都係考慮因素

[rankinelo]

yoyo726 CHing,

>>135 質量如果係指PQ 就好過小白好多 散景奶好多 光圈F2 可用景深極淺
Totally agree. This is 2 different level (in terms of PQ) at all. You can also realize this from the MTF chart provided by canon website

I have 135L and all I can say is that this lens is totally exceptionally amazing! The bokeh is so milky that 2.8 can never provide...

Just it is not suitable to take protrait for 500D... You need to stand very far away in order to take a full body protrait

If your "protrait" is your kid, then you need not think about 135L and go straight to 小白 for 500D

Just one more thing,
135L is not supposed to have safe shutter until ISO 1600 to 3200 at night... because 135L has no IS...

[h0001244]

If they upgrade the 135 to IS, it would be a very useful lens even at home
but the price would be over $10k

[rankinelo]

h0001244 CHing,

In fact I don't really want the IS version, since it may degrade the lens as well...

for day time, 135L/2 is large enough to do all the shots,

for night time... ISO 3200 must be better and better for the DSLR in the future, so IS or not... in fact not that important

[homankop]

70-200 F2.8IS

[onjo3]

U can estimate 135f/2 IS how much if u see 200/2 IS