[iu0702]

本人準備加入DSLR行列. 做左好多research, 有以下兩個選擇.
1) Nikon D60
2) Canon 1000D
For新手, 邊個會好d呢?

又, D60 同D80又差得多唔多呢??

Thank you 各位!

[waisin4000]

Nikon D60 因為用只可用AFS鏡對焦，日後如果想用定焦鏡可能不方便，1000D沒有這個問題。Nikon可用AFS對焦的少於二十支，而且七成以上都是貴價鏡頭

而且Canon有一個好處便是佢的一條龍設計，如果相機和印表機都是Canon的話，相片出來和螢幕出來的會很接近。

還有Canon的鏡頭質素/價錢是較好的，例如Canon 2470約1萬元，但鄰家的要多4000元才可有同一級數的鏡頭

最後紅圈白鏡會較搶眼。

[hanny]

nikon body build is good
and the funtion look great this time

but canon white balance is better
for example i use a canon low level 1000d with flash photo a night sence
the picture color and quanlity is better than d300
becasue the new nikon expee cpu make the picture color so hard and detail jam so nikon color is not detail feel also
for auto white balance nikon useing flash to photo face color is very hard not natual but canon color with flash on face color is very natual

this is what i feeling deep on it
becasue d3 d300 and canon 1000d all i got

and for d60 and 1000d
1000d is far away better than d60

for speed canon is little bit faster than nikon

[hanny]

about the out focusing
every model every brand of camera with a little bit this is normal
nikon om or canon alos with this matter
but if not using big aperture normally will not out focus

becasue big aperture is not easy to shoot
every camera is same


final is

nikon

1>nikon bright and feeling sharp <not 100% sharp becasue can be set >
2>body build feeling pro new model iso controll good

canon
1>color good and natual
2>lens focus speed fast
3>white balance good

[Obi-Wan]

I have both CANON & NIKON systems, for beginners, D60 produces far better jpeg photos than 400D (or 1000D), also the cheap cheap lens of Nikon are much better than the cheap cheap lens of Canon.

If u just want to get from experience in DSLR, buy D60, its kit VR lens is very good! also the price is also very good, water good for D60 Kit dropped to near $4000 last month.

the color of D60 is very similar to DC, not real, but very attractive to many people.

the color of CANON is very natural, but very dull

[kaawai]

兩間大廠的入門機，難分高下！

不過CANON 的機身有兩年保養，又睇高一線

如果 想 “ 平“，可以考慮 SONY A 300

＄5000 鬆D 有 雙鏡頭

[Mcdullchan]

Canon, no.1 choice

[ivanphoon]

canon 1000d is better than nikon d60......

[dcdream]

唔駛講，一定係住能 Canon

[老叟]

,車,乜又係老黃賣花???

[karlison]

I think it's meaningless to ask this question in either Nikon / Canon forum. People in Nikon forum will tell you Nikon is better and vice versa.

Go to the shop and feel them. You will know the answer easily.

I tried, and thought I like Nikon D60/D80 more. However, I bought 2nd hand Canon 400D finally because my friend sold me with $1xxx with kit lens! Now I'm quite happy with my 400D.

[Louis @ Gooner]

一定要二揀一我會兩樣都唔揀, 我建議450D or D80二揀一

1000D相片見過了, 效果同450D分別不大
但1000D LCD mon上無sensor自動感應塊面隊埋去就off
呢樣我好反感, 所以我建議你買450D
不過係好主觀的, 你唔mind其實冇問題

D60相片見過, D80我有朋友用緊, 相片質素同450D不相伯仲, 各有優點
450D 色彩接近肉眼所見效果, D80就較有電影感同顏色較深
depends on 個人喜好啦, 其實一d好激進既comment多數都係主觀的
光線不足環境下失焦走焦, 任何品牌 低階機 都有此情況, 一分錢一分貨
根本唔係品牌問題... 亦唔會去到 "中計" 咁誇張囉 = ="
難度用緊各品牌低階機既所有用家都中晒計?
正如kawai兄所講,SONY A300五千鬆d有雙鏡, 咁咪直頭係陷阱?

考慮埋鏡頭方面, 因應個人需要啦, 我認為初入門冇必要買咁貴
就以Canon為例, 經常聽到c hing 們講 *大三元, *小三元, *窮人三寶
我認為初學者窮人三寶夠做了, 大小三元等將來upgrade上FF再考慮吧
而Nikon亦有同grade價錢相約的鏡, 只係用家叫法or術語唔同
不同品牌以入門價買入門器材, 出黎相片質素唔會極之大

最後都係果句 : 意境重於器材
意境同構圖唔掂, 幾靚器才揸上手都係得物無所用
用九流器材練到一流技術先叫真正學識影相





*大三元 : 16~35, 24~70, 70~300 (f/2.8)
*小三元 : 17~40, 24~105, 70~300 (f/4)
*窮人三寶 : 50mm f/1.8, 18~55 IS, 55~250 IS

[Real Nobody]

喂，大佬呀，呢度係Canon討論區呀！你問Canon定Nikon好？唔係啩？！係人都知會有咩答案啦！

[Louis @ Gooner]

正常既, 可能佢係Nikon討論區又問下意見compare下呢

我入450D之前都做好多research, 機, 鏡, 價錢, 際用性...
問晒Canon人同Nikon人先決定, 最後埋左Canon埋 =P

[onlyken]

唔應該起Nikon 或Canon 討論區問依d問題, d討論好容易變得政治化!